Mark Latta v. State of Arkansas
Annotate this CaseARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
No. CR 03-494
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
MARK LATTA
APPELLANT
VS.
STATE OF ARKANSAS
APPELLEE
Opinion Delivered November 11, 2004
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GARLAND COUNTY, NO. CR. 98-390-1, HONORABLE JOHN HOMER WRIGHT, JUDGE
PETITION FOR REHEARING DENIED
.
PER CURIAM
Appellant appealed the denial of his petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37 by the Circuit Court of Garland County. On October 7, 2004, we affirmed the circuit court's order, holding that appellant had failed to show prejudice. Latta v. State, CR 03-494 (Ark. Oct. 7, 2004). Appellant now petitions for rehearing, and urges this court to reconsider our decision. Rule 2-3(g) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court provides that a petition for rehearing should be used to call attention to specific errors of law or fact which the opinion is thought to contain and not to repeat arguments already considered and rejected by this court. Because appellant fails to identify any specific errors of law or fact and instead, reargues the issues, we decline to grant his petition for rehearing.
Petition for rehearing denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.