Joe Copeland v. State of Arkansas
Annotate this CaseARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
No. CR 03-180
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
JOE COPELAND
Appellant
v.
STATE OF ARKANSAS
Appellee
Opinion Delivered January 27, 2005
APPEAL FROM THE SEVIER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. CR-98-54, HON. TED C. CAPEHEART, JUDGE
AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM
Appellant was found guilty of first-degree murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment. We affirmed. Copeland v. State, 343 Ark. 327, 37 S.W.3d 567 (2001). Appellant then filed a petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Cr. P. 37. By written order, the circuit court denied relief. We previously ordered rebriefing, Copeland v. State, CR 03-180 (Ark. Jan. 8, 2004)(per curiam) (unpublished), and the appeal is again before us.
Once again, appellant has failed to include a complete abstract of all relevant portions of his trial in his brief on appeal as required by Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(5) (2003). See Hubbard v. State, 334 Ark. 321, 324, 973 S.W.2d 804, 805 (1998)(per curiam). As a result, we cannot reach the merits of appellant's claims on appeal.
Pursuant to Rule 4-2(b)(3), if an appellant fails to file a complying abstract, the judgment or order may be affirmed for noncompliance with the rule. Here, appellant has had ample opportunity to provide a sufficient abstract and has failed to do so. Accordingly, the order is affirmed for noncompliance with Rule 4-2(a)(5).
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.