Chad Hilderbrand v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction

ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

January 29, 2004

CHAD HILDERBRAND

Appellant

v.

LARRY NORRIS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

Appellee

03-982

PRO SE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [CIRCUIT COURT OF IZARD COUNTY, NO. CIV 2001-30-2, HON. JOHN NORMAN HARKEY, JUDGE]

MOTION DISMISSED

Per Curiam

Chad Hilderbrand, who is incarcerated pursuant to a judgment of conviction, filed in the circuit court in the county in which he was incarcerated a petition and amended petitions for writ of habeas corpus. The court denied the relief sought, and Hilderbrand lodged an appeal from that order. We dismissed the appeal as it was clear that appellant Hilderbrand could not succeed on appeal inasmuch as the allegations raised in the habeas petition and amended petitions were not sufficient to demonstrate that the commitment was invalid or that the trial court lacked jurisdiction.

Appellant now asks that we reconsider that decision.

We need not reiterate the grounds for the dismissal of the appeal which were set out in our opinion. It will suffice to say that the appellant was clearly entitled to no relief. As a result, he could not have mounted a successful appeal from the order.

Motion dismissed.