Timothy L. Waddle and Irene L. Waddle v. State of Arkansas

Annotate this Case
yTimothy L. WADDLE and Irene L. Waddle v.
STATE of Arkansas

CR 97-71                                           ___ S.W.2d ___

                    Supreme Court of Arkansas
               Opinion delivered February 3, 1997


Appeal & error -- motion for belated appeal -- good cause for granting. -- 
     The supreme court treated appellants' request for rule on the
     clerk as a motion for a belated appeal; the error of failing
     to timely file a notice of appeal, admittedly made by counsel
     for criminal defendants, is good cause to grant the motion.


     Motion for Rule on the Clerk treated as Motion for Belated
Appeal; granted.
     C. Richard Lippard, for appellant.
     No response.

     Per Curiam. 
     The appellants, Timothy L. Waddle and Irene L. Waddle, have
filed a motion for rule on the clerk.  Their attorney, C. Richard
Lippard, admits that the notice of appeal was untimely filed due to
a mistake on his part.  
     We treat appellants' request for rule on the clerk as a motion
for a belated appeal.  See, e.g., Hicks v. State, 325 Ark. 192, 923 S.W.2d 872 (1996).  We find that the error of failing to timely
file a notice of appeal, admittedly made by counsel for criminal
defendants, is good cause to grant the motion.  See In Re: Belated
Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).
     We grant the motion for belated appeal.  A copy of this
opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional
Conduct.  

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.