David Carson v. State of Arkansas
Annotate this CaseARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
DIVISION III
DAVID CARSON
APPELLANT
V.
STATE OF ARKANSAS
APPELLEE
CACR04-863
March 16, 2005
APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FORT SMITH DISTRICT [NO. CR-03-821]
HON. NORMAN WILKINSON,
JUDGE
REBRIEFING ORDERED
John Mauzy Pittman, Chief Judge
Appellant, David Carson, appeals from a conditional guilty plea, arguing that the search conducted in his home following a "knock and talk" investigation was invalid because he was not warned that he could refuse to permit a search. Appellant's notice of appeal does not appear in the brief, abstract, and addendum filed with this court.
Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8) requires that an appellant's brief shall contain an addendum containing, inter alia, pleadings essential to an understanding of the court's jurisdiction on appeal. The notice of appeal is such a pleading. Villines v. Harris, ___ Ark. ___, ___ S.W.3d ___ (March 3, 2005). Appellant's addendum is therefore deficient, and we direct appellant to cure the deficiency by filing a substituted abstract, addendum, and brief within fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order.
Robbins and Neal, JJ., agree.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.