Ex parte Gregory Lenard Weaver. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: Gregory Lenard Weaver v. State of Alabama) (Houston Circuit Court: CC-09-1880; Criminal Appeals : CR-10-1851). Writ Denied. No Opinion.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

REL:9/21/12 Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o formal r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e R e p o r t e r o f D e c i s i o n s , A l a b a m a A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1 ( ( 3 3 4 ) 2 2 9 ¬ 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may b e made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r . SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA SPECIAL TERM, 2012 1111146 Ex p a r t e Gregory Lenard Weaver PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In r e : Gregory Lenard Weaver v. S t a t e o f Alabama) (Houston C i r c u i t Court, CC-09-1880; Court o f C r i m i n a l Appeals, CR-10-1851) MALONE, C h i e f Justice. WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION. Woodall, Stuart, Bolin, Parker, concur. Murdock and Wise, J J . , d i s s e n t . Shaw, and Main, JJ. , 1111146 WISE, J u s t i c e ( d i s s e n t i n g ) . For the reasons set forth, while I was serving as the p r e s i d i n g j u d g e on t h e A l a b a m a C o u r t o f C r i m i n a l A p p e a l s , i n my dissent i n S y k e s v. S t a t e , 25 So. 3d 485, 485 ( A l a . Crim. App. 2 0 0 9 ) , and i n P r e s i d i n g Judge B a s c h a b ' s d i s s e n t i n G a r g i s v. S t a t e , 998 So. 2d 1092, 1100 ( A l a . C r i m . App. 2007), which I j o i n e d , I r e s p e c t f u l l y d i s s e n t from the d e n i a l of c e r t i o r a r i review i n t h i s case. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.