Ex parte Benito Ocampo Albarran. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: Benito Ocampo Albarran v. State of Alabama) (Madison Circuit Court: CC-06-1522; Criminal Appeals : CR-07-2147). Writ Quashed. No Opinion.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Rel: 05/18/2012 Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o formal r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e Reporter o f Decisions, A l a b a m a A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1 ( ( 3 3 4 ) 2 2 9 ¬ 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may b e made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r . SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM, 2011-2012 1101279 Ex p a r t e Benito Ocampo A l b a r r a n PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In r e : Benito Ocampo A l b a r r a n v. S t a t e o f Alabama) (Madison C i r c u i t Court, CC-06-1522; Court o f C r i m i n a l Appeals, CR-07-2147) PER CURIAM. WRIT QUASHED. NO OPINION. Woodall, concur. Stuart, Bolin, Parker, M u r d o c k , a n d Shaw, J J . , Main, J . , concurs i n p a r t and d i s s e n t s i n p a r t . Wise, J . , recuses h e r s e l f . * * J u s t i c e W i s e was a member o f t h e C o u r t A p p e a l s when t h a t c o u r t c o n s i d e r e d t h i s c a s e . of Criminal 1101279 MAIN, J u s t i c e ( c o n c u r r i n g On November certiorari as Albarran's petition. issue 20. to 17, 2011, issue However, i n p a r t and d i s s e n t i n g i n p a r t ) . 1 this and I concur because issue granted 20 the w r i t i n Benito i n quashing I would d i s s e n t from t h i s Court's order as t o t h a t Court the w r i t consider issue of Ocampo as t o 1, I i n s o f a r as i t q u a s h e d t h e w r i t issue. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.