Ex parte Michael Hardy. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: Alabama State Personnel Board v. Michael Hardy) (Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-07-1817; Civil Appeals : 2070589). Writ Denied. No Opinion.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

REL:07/17/2009 Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o formal r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e R e p o r t e r o f D e c i s i o n s , A l a b a m a A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1 ( ( 3 3 4 ) 2 2 9 ¬ 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may b e made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r . SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA SPECIAL TERM, 2009 1080451 Ex p a r t e M i c h a e l Hardy PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF C I V I L APPEALS (In r e : Alabama S t a t e P e r s o n n e l Board v. Michael Hardy) (Montgomery C i r c u i t C o u r t , Court o f C i v i l Appeals, BOLIN, Justice. WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION. CV-07-1817; 2070589) 1080451 Cobb, C.J., and Lyons, Stuart, concur. Murdock, Woodall J . , concurs specially. and P a r k e r , J J . , d i s s e n t . 2 Smith, and Shaw, J J . , 1080451 MURDOCK, J u s t i c e ( c o n c u r r i n g The the circuit Court Hardy, Civ. of [Ms. App. to court, Civil why i n an Appeals, 2 0 7 0 5 8 9 , Dec. 2008), gave of each 1 specially). the order Alabama 31, a to the the termination Department evidence uphold been based was factual findings termination on § Hardy's Services the State of 41-22-20(k)(5) on not which Board's employment through (7), A l a . the with by the by the circuit decision appears as Board, supported the v. State employment made of (Ala. explanation In t h i s r e g a r d , Personnel Hardy's , the State Personnel Michael law j u d g e h e r s e l f . Board recommendation to the Youth r e v e r s a l of the 3d grounds the and/or administrative court's of of opinion Personnel compelling substantive B o a r d , i n t u r n a d o p t e d by i n the So. seemingly Personnel out State 2008] a d m i n i s t r a t i v e law j u d g e b a s e d her uphold set to Code to have 1975. Other than a c o n s t i t u t i o n a l due-process argument, Hardy s t a t e s no ground Court for of C i v i l judgment w i t h review by this Appeals erred respect to Court relating i n r e v e r s i n g the these substantive to whether circuit the court's grounds. I r e f e r the reader to the o p i n i o n of the Court of C i v i l A p p e a l s f o r f a c t s and p r o c e d u r a l h i s t o r y p e r t a i n i n g t o t h i s case. 1 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.