Evan W. Smith v. Billie C. Burkhalter et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
REL:08/28/2009 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 2290649), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA SPECIAL TERM, 2009 ____________________ 1080202 ____________________ Evan W. Smith v. Billie C. Burkhalter et al. Appeal from Cherokee Circuit Court (CV-08-111) On Application for Rehearing BOLIN, Justice. On May 15, 2009, this Court dismissed Evan W. Smith's appeal of an election contest on the basis that the circuit court was without jurisdiction to enter a judgment. On application for rehearing, candidates Jimmy Wallace, Billie C. 1080202 Burkhalter, and Lenora McWhorter ask this Court to clarify its holding that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to entertain an election contest from a municipal general election in a multi-candidate field when no candidate received a majority of the votes. Specifically, they ask us to clarify whether that portion of the circuit court's judgment declaring McWhorter to be the duly elected council person for district two is also void. On September 2, 2008, the Town of Cedar Bluff certified the election results and concluded that a runoff election was necessary between Steve Lay and Ethel Sprouse for the mayoral race and between Burkhalter and Smith for the district-one council position and that Donald Sanders was elected to the district-two council position. After a contest challenging absentee ballots, the circuit court declared Burkhalter the winner of the district-one position and McWhorter the winner of the district-two position and held that there should be a runoff election in the mayor's race between Wallace and Sprouse. Smith appealed, and this Court held that the circuit court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to entertain an election contest from a municipal general election in a multi- 2 1080202 candidate field when no candidate secured a majority of the votes cast because § 11-46-69, Ala. Code 1975, provides that only the election of a person "declared elected" to a municipal office may be contested. In the district-two council position, the Town of Cedar Bluff declared Sanders as the winner. was "declared elected" in In other words, Sanders accordance with § 11-46-69; therefore, the circuit court had subject-matter jurisdiction to entertain district-two a contest council challenging position. the After election the to the contest, the circuit court declared McWhorter the winner of the districttwo race. court's Sanders did not appeal. judgment declaring Accordingly, the circuit McWhorter the winner of the district-two council position stands. APPLICATION OVERRULED. Cobb, C.J., and Lyons, Woodall, Stuart, Smith, Parker, Murdock, and Shaw, JJ., concur. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
