G. E. G., alias v. State of Alabama

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Rel: 07/30/2010 Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o formal r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e R e p o r t e r o f D e c i s i o n s , Alabama A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1 ((334) 2 2 9 - 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may b e made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r . ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2009-2010 CR-07-0036 G.E.G. v. S t a t e o f Alabama Appeal from Montgomery C i r c u i t (CC-07-623) Court A f t e r Remand f r o m t h e A l a b a m a Supreme Court WELCH, J u d g e . This CR-07-0036, 2008), Court's December judgment 19, 2008] i n G.E.G. So. 3d v. State, [Ms. ( A l a . Crim. App. r e v e r s i n g G.E.G.'s c o n v i c t i o n s f o r p o s s e s s i o n o f drug CR-07-0036 paraphernalia and second-degree possession of marijuana, 1 v i o l a t i o n s o f §§ 1 3 A - 1 2 - 2 6 0 ( c ) a n d 1 3 A - 1 2 - 2 1 4 , A l a . C o d e 1 9 7 5 , has been r e v e r s e d by t h e Alabama E.G., [Ms. 1 0 8 0 7 7 9 , Pursuant entered May 7, 2 0 1 0 ] t o t h e Supreme on December Court's i s hereby convictions f o rpossession of Court i n Ex p a r t e So. 3d set aside, of drug as i t r e v e r s e d a n d we G. ( A l a . 2010). opinion, t h i s Court's 19, 2008, i n s o f a r convictions degree possession Supreme now a f f i r m judgment two drug G.E.G.'s p a r a p h e r n a l i a and second- marijuana. AFFIRMED. Wise, J., P . J . , and K e l l u m and Main, J J . ,concur. Windom, recuses herself. This Court affirmed G.E.G.'s c o n v i c t i o n torture. See § 1 3 A - 6 - 6 6 5 . 1 , A l a . Code 1975. 1 2 for sexual

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.