James Allen Harrison, Jr. v. State of Alabama

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

REL: 06/25/2010 Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o formal r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e R e p o r t e r o f D e c i s i o n s , Alabama A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1 ((334) 2 2 9 - 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may b e made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r . ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2009-2010 CR-05-2411 James A l l e n H a r r i s o n , J r . v. S t a t e o f Alabama Appeal from R u s s e l l C i r c u i t (CC-98-195.60) On Remand f r o m MAIN, t h e Alabama Court Supreme Court Judge. I n an u n p u b l i s h e d memorandum i s s u e d on A u g u s t 2 1 , 2007, t h i s C o u r t a f f i r m e d t h e c i r c u i t c o u r t ' s summary d e n i a l o f t h e Rule filed 32, A l a . R . C r i m . P . , petition b y James A l l e n H a r r i s o n , f o r postconviction Jr. See H a r r i s o n relief v. S t a t e , CR-05-2411 (No. CR-05-2411) (table). 19 So. The A l a b a m a 1 3d 259 (Ala. Supreme C o u r t j u d g m e n t a n d remanded t h e c a u s e Crim. App. reversed this 2007) Court's f o r t h i s C o u r t t o remand t h e c a u s e t o t h e c i r c u i t c o u r t f o r " a n e v i d e n t i a r y h e a r i n g on t h e merits of determination trial." So. Harrison's juror-misconduct as t o whether claims Harrison i s entitled a t o a new Ex p a r t e H a r r i s o n , [Ms. 1070223, A p r i l 2 3 , 2010] 3d ___ , ___ ( A l a . 2010). A c c o r d i n g l y , we cause t o t h e R u s s e l l C i r c u i t C o u r t f o r p r o c e e d i n g s w i t h t h e A l a b a m a Supreme C o u r t ' s o p i n i o n . filed and i n this Court w i t h i n 42 d a y s remand this consistent Due r e t u r n s h a l l be of the release of t h i s opinion. REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. W i s e , P . J . , a n d W e l c h , Windom, a n d K e l l u m , J J . , c o n c u r . J u d g e M a i n was n o t on t h e C o u r t when t h e u n p u b l i s h e d memorandum a f f i r m i n g t h e t r i a l c o u r t ' s o r d e r was i s s u e d . The c a s e was a s s i g n e d t o Judge M a i n when t h e A l a b a m a Supreme C o u r t remanded i t t o t h i s C o u r t . 1 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.