S.H.F. v. R.H. and Tuscaloosa County Department of Human Resources

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

REL: November 19, 2021 STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2021-2022 2200650, 2200651, 2200652, and 2200653 S.H.F. v. R.H. and Tuscaloosa County Department of Human Resources. Appeals from Tuscaloosa Juvenile Court (JU-12-236.08, JU-12-237.08, JU12-238.08, and JU-12-239.09). FRIDY, Judge. 2200650 -- AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. 2200651 -- AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. 2200652 -- AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. 2200653 -- AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R. App. P.; § 12-15-314(f)(10)a., Ala. Code 1975; First Union Nat. Bank of Fla. v. Lee Cnty. Comm'n, 75 So. 3d 105, 111–12 (Ala. 2011); Ware v. Timmons, 954 So. 2d 545, 556 (Ala. 2006); DeKalb Cnty. LP Gas Co. v. Suburban Gas, Inc., 729 So. 2d 270, 275 (Ala. 1998); Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc. v. Nielsen, 714 So. 2d 293, 296 (Ala. 1998); Carson v. City of Prichard, 709 So.2d 1199, 1206 (Ala. 1998); Ex parte McLendon, 455 So. 2d 863 (Ala. 1984); Echols v. State, 24 Ala. App. 352, 353, 135 So. 410, 411 (1931); and Wood v. Wood, 333 So. 2d 826, 828 (Ala. Civ. App. 1976). Thompson, P.J., and Moore, Edwards, and Hanson, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.