C.G. v. Tuscaloosa County Department of Human Resources

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

REL: November 22, 2019 STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2019-2020 2180608 C.G. v. Tuscaloosa County Department of Human Resources. Appeal from Tuscaloosa Juvenile Court (JU-15-514.03). 2180625 A.P. v. Tuscaloosa County Department of Human Resources. Appeal from Tuscaloosa Juvenile Court (JU-15-514.03). DONALDSON, Judge. 2180608 -- AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P.; § 1215-319(a)(2),(7),(8), and (12), Ala. Code 1975; § 12-15-320(a), Ala. Code 1975; Rule 25(D), Ala. R. Juv. P.; Boshell v. Keith, 418 So. 2d 89, 92 (Ala. 1982); T.D. v. S.R., [Ms. 2180394, July 26, 2019] ___ So. 3d ___, ___ (Ala. Civ. App. 2019); J.S. v. S.L., 244 So. 3d 120, 125 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017); K.S.B. v. M.C.B., 219 So. 3d 650, 653 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016); S.S. v. Calhoun Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 212 So. 3d 940, 949 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016); J.L. v. Morgan Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 182 So. 3d 570, 572 (Ala. Civ. App. 2015); M.H. v. Cleburne Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 158 So. 3d 471, 475–76 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014); A.E.T., Jr. v. Limestone Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 49 So. 3d 1212, 1218 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010); A.F. v. Madison Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 58 So. 3d 205, 215 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010); Jefferson Cty. Dep't of Human Res. v. L.S., 60 So. 3d 308, 315-16 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010); and J.F.S. III v. Mobile Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 38 So. 3d 75, 78 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009). 2180625 -- AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P.; § 12-15-301(1), Ala. Code 1975; § 12-15-319(a)(1), Ala. Code 1975; D.M. v. Jefferson Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 232 So. 3d 237, 242 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017); K.S.B. v. M.C.B., 219 So. 3d 2180608 and 2180625 650, 653 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016); and S.S. v. Calhoun Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 212 So. 3d 940, 949 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016). Thompson, P.J., and Moore, Edwards, and Hanson, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.