Steven M. Bailey v. Michele D. Bailey

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Rel: 08/30/2019 STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS SPECIAL TERM, 2019 2180164 Steven M. Bailey v. Michele D. Bailey. Appeal from Baldwin Circuit Court (DR-15-901143). THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R. App. P.; Rule 32(C)(1), Ala. R. Jud. Admin.; Comment to Amendments Effective January 1, 2009, Rule 32, Ala. R. Jud. Admin.; Thomas v. Heard, 256 So. 3d 644, 662 (Ala. 2017); Ex parte Fann, 810 So. 2d 631, 633 (Ala. 2001); Bittick v. Bittich, [Ms. 2180149, Aug. 30, 2019] So. 3d , (Ala. Civ. App. 2019); Call v. Call, 135 So. 3d 254, 261–62 (Ala. Civ. App. 2013); Meigs v. Estate of Mobley, 134 So. 3d 878, 890 n. 9 (Ala. Civ. App. 2013); Lacey v. Lacey, 126 So. 3d 1029, 1032 (Ala. Civ. App. 2013); State Dep't of Transp. v. Reid, 74 So. 3d 465, 469 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011); Anderson v. Anderson, 65 So. 3d 435, 440 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010); Woodruff v. Woodruff, 23 So. 3d 1149, 1155 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009); Shewbart v. Shewbart, 19 So. 3d 223, 231 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009); Arnold v. Arnold, 977 So. 2d 501, 509 (Ala. Civ. App. 2007); Pate v. Guy, 942 So. 2d 380, 386 (Ala. Civ. App. 2005); Fort James Operating Co. v. Irby, 895 So. 2d 282, 285 n. 1 (Ala. Civ. App. 2004), rev'd on other grounds, Ex parte Fort James Operating Co., 895 So. 2d 294 (Ala. 2004); TenEyck v. TenEyck, 885 So. 2d 146, 156 (Ala. Civ. App. 2003)(plurality); Pate v. Pate, 849 So. 2d 972, 977 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002); J.L. v. A.Y., 844 So. 2d 1221, 1226 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002); Courtright v. Courtright, 757 So. 2d 453, 456 (Ala. Civ. App. 2000); Bushnell v. Bushnell, 713 So. 2d 962, 965 (Ala. Civ. App. 1997); O'Neal v. O'Neal, 678 So. 2d 161, 164 (Ala. Civ. App. 1996); Albertson v. Albertson, 678 So. 2d 118, 120 (Ala. Civ. App. 1995); Dodd v. Dodd, 669 So. 2d 915, 916 (Ala. Civ. App. 1995); Parrish v. Parrish, 617 So. 2d 1036, 1038 (Ala. Civ. App. 1993); and Patterson v. Patterson, 585 So. 3d 1389, 1390 (Ala. Civ. App. 1991). 2180164 The appellant's request for an attorney fee on appeal is denied. The appellee is awarded an attorney fee on appeal of $5,000. Moore, Donaldson, Edwards, and Hanson, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.