B.T. v. Jefferson County Department of Human Resources

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
REL: 06/21/2019 STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2018-2019 2180129, 2180130, and 2180131 A.W. v. Jefferson County Department of Human Resources. Appeals from Jefferson Juvenile Court (JU-12-34.03, JU-12-35.03, and JU-17-1090.02). 2180132 B.T. v. Jefferson County Department of Human Resources Appeal from Jefferson Juvenile Court (JU-17-1090.02). MOORE, Judge. 2180129, 2180130, and 2180131 –- AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R. App. P.; Ala. Code 1975, § 12–15–319(a)(2); Ex parte McInish, 47 So. 3d 767, 778 (Ala. 2008); Ex parte T.V., 971 So. 2d 1, 9 (Ala. 2007); Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., 612 So. 2d 409, 410 (Ala. 1992); C.O. v. Jefferson Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 206 So. 3d 621, 627 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016); B.M. v. Jefferson Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 183 So. 3d 157, 161 (Ala. Civ. App. 2015); J.W. v. C.B., 68 So. 3d 878, 879 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011); A.E.T. v. Limestone Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 49 So. 3d 1212, 1219 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010); M.A.J. v. S.F., 994 So. 2d 280, 292 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008); J.B. v. Cleburne Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 991 So. 2d 273, 282 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008); and Haag v. Cherokee Cty. Dep't of Pensions & Sec., 489 So. 2d 586, 588 (Ala. Civ. App. 1986). 2180132 –- AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R. App. P.; Ex parte McInish, 47 So. 3d 767, 778 (Ala. 2008); Ex parte T.V., 971 So. 2d 1, 9 (Ala. 2007); C.O. v. Jefferson Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 206 So. 3d 621, 627 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016); J.W. v. C.B., 68 So. 3d 878, 879 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011); A.E.T. v. Limestone Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 49 So. 3d 1212, 1219 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010); J.B. v. Cleburne Cty. Dep't of Human Res., 2180129, 2180130, 2180131, and 2180132 991 So. 2d 273, 282 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008); and Haag v. Cherokee Cty. Dep't of Pensions & Sec., 489 So. 2d 586, 588 (Ala. Civ. App. 1986). Thompson, P.J., and Donaldson, Edwards, and Hanson, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.