Samantha Adams-Kelley v. Joseph Katen Kelley

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

REL: 08/02/2019 STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS SPECIAL TERM, 2019 2171158 Samantha Adams-Kelley v. Joseph Katen Kelley. Appeal from Lee Circuit Court (DR-14-900223.03). THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A and F), Ala. R. App. P.; Ex parte Ferguson, 819 So. 2d 626, 629 (Ala. 2001); Gordon v. Gordon, 231 So. 3d 347, 352–53 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017); Byrd v. Byrd, 217 So. 3d 885, 898 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016); Ezell v. Graham, 135 So. 3d 979, 983-85 (Ala. Civ. App. 2013); K.T.D. v. K.W.P., 119 So. 3d 418, 428 (Ala. Civ. App. 2012); Johnson v. Johnson, 66 So. 3d 784, 786 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011); Cheek v. Dyess, 1 So. 3d 1025, 1029 (Ala. Civ. App. 2007); Pate v. Guy, 934 So. 2d 1070, 1072 (Ala. Civ. App. 2005); Architectura, Inc. v. Miller, 769 So. 2d 330, 332 (Ala. Civ. App. 2000); Shellhouse v. Bentley, 690 So. 2d 401 (Ala. Civ. App. 1997); and Hagler v. Hagler, 460 So. 2d 187, 189 (Ala. Civ. App. 1984). The appellant's motion to strike the exhibit attached to the appellee's brief is granted. Moore, Donaldson, Edwards, and Hanson, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.