Donald Keith Hambric v. Sharon Elizabeth Hambric

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
REL: 4/26/2019 STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2018-2019 2170607 Donald Keith Hambric v. Sharon Elizabeth Hambric. Appeal from Walker Circuit Court (DR-17-900151). HANSON, Judge. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R. App. P.; Rule 10(d), Ala. R. App. P.; Ex parte Burnsed, 844 So. 2d 526, 528 (Ala. 2001); Ex parte French, 547 So. 2d 547, 549 (Ala. 1989); Seidler v. Phillips, 496 So. 2d 714, 716 (Ala. 1986); Trimble v. City of Prichard, 438 So. 2d 745, 747 (Ala. 1983); Knight v. Knight, 226 So. 3d 688, 693 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016); Cousins v. McNeel, 96 So. 3d 846, 857 (Ala. Civ. App. 2012); Beatty v. Beatty, 991 So. 2d 761, 765-66 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008); Bushnell v. Bushnell, 713 So. 2d 962, 964–65 (Ala. Civ. App. 1997); State ex rel. Gibson v. Gibson, 555 So. 2d 1092, 1093 (Ala. Civ. App. 1989); and Strickland v. State, 829 So. 2d 786, 788 (Ala. Crim. App. 2002). The appellee's request for attorney fees on appeal is denied. The appellee's motion to affirm the trial court's judgment is denied as moot. Thompson, P.J., and Moore, Donaldson, and Edwards, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.