Gloria Savage v. Dr. Timothy Marlow et al. (Appeal from Wilcox Circuit Court: CV-12-8) Application For Rehearing Overruled.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

REL: 09/13/2013 Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o formal r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e R e p o r t e r o f D e c i s i o n s , Alabama A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1 ((334) 2 2 9 - 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may b e made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r . ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS SPECIAL TERM, 2013 2120078 G l o r i a Savage v. Dr. Timothy Marlow e t a l . Appeal from Wilcox C i r c u i t (CV-12-8) Court On A p p l i c a t i o n f o r R e h e a r i n g PITTMAN, Judge. Gloria asserts Savage ("Gloria") has a p p l i e d f o r r e h e a r i n g and i n her application that this court should n o t have d i s m i s s e d h e r a p p e a l as u n t i m e l y f i l e d b e c a u s e , s h e s a y s , this 2120078 c o u r t had p r e v i o u s l y c o n s i d e r e d t h a t i s s u e and her to appeal Before would be Gloria's assigned, this appeal court p a r t i e s addressing had been timely was proceed taken requested as under "letter ruled that timely filed. submission briefs" and from the the i s s u e whether G l o r i a ' s n o t i c e of appeal complied with that B a s e d on t h e a s s e r t i o n i n G l o r i a ' s l e t t e r b r i e f request. she had permitted had filed, and the parties that f i l e d h e r m o t i o n t i t l e d " M o t i o n t o R e c o n s i d e r Judgment E n t e r e d by t h e C o u r t on t h e 2 1 s t Day o f May 2012 or[,] in the A l t e r n a t i v e , [ t o ] G r a n t R e l i e f f r o m [ t h a t ] Judgment U n d e r R u l e 60(b)(6) 11, of 2012, have the we been [Alabama Rules of C i v i l timely submission regarding filed, and, filed on and therefore, assigned, Gloria's action S y s t e m and on June d e t e r m i n e d t h a t G l o r i a ' s n o t i c e of appeal might a p p e a l t o p r o c e e d . However, a f t e r under Procedure]" i n the 8, 2012, conclusively established rather that permitted G l o r i a ' s a p p e a l was our review State than of the Judicial t h e r e c o r d on a p p e a l r e v e a l e d June we taken entries Information that that motion June 11, Gloria's notice 2012, of untimely filed f o r the reasons explained i n our original s u b m i s s i o n . An initial r u l i n g by an 2 her was which appeal was opinion on appellate court 2120078 permitting an reconsideration jurisdiction to review 10, appeal to proceed o f the fundamental question of t h e r e c o r d . " ' " O'Hare v. O'Hare, So. 3d , preclude appellate [Ms. 2110968, May ( A l a . C i v . App. 2013) ( q u o t i n g R.P.M. v . P.D.A., 112 So. 3d 49, 50 Civ. not a f t e r an a p p e l l a t e c o u r t h a s h a d an o p p o r t u n i t y 2013] quoting "'"does ( A l a . C i v . App. 2 0 1 2 ) , i n t u r n S m i t h v. S m i t h , 919 So. 2d 315, 316 n.1 ( A l a . App. application 2005)). Accordingly, we overrule Gloria's f o r rehearing. APPLICATION OVERRULED. Thompson, P . J . , a n d Thomas, Moore, a n d D o n a l d s o n , J J . , concur. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.