Mohamed Abdo Saleh v. Joe Holmes Oil Company, Inc.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

REL: 04/26/2013 Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o formal r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e R e p o r t e r o f D e c i s i o n s , Alabama A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1 ((334) 2 2 9 - 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may b e made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r . ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2012-2013 2111236 Mohamed Abdo Saleh v. Joe Holmes O i l Company, Inc. Appeal from F r a n k l i n C i r c u i t (CV-12-119) Court THOMAS, J u d g e . Mohamed Abdo S a l e h a p p e a l s from a p r e l i m i n a r y i n j u n c t i o n e n t e r e d b y t h e F r a n k l i n C i r c u i t C o u r t a g a i n s t h i m i n an a c t i o n brought b y J o e Holmes O i l Company, I n c . ("Holmes Oil"), a l l e g i n g u n l a w f u l d e t a i n e r , goods a n d m a t e r i a l s s o l d , a c c o u n t s 2111236 stated, a n d open a c c o u n t . Additionally, injunctive relief. Saleh complaint on A u g u s t 24, 2012. hearing on Holmes Oil's was date. order injunction. request On Holmes to this supreme c o u r t Oil's § court scheduled for injunctive request Oil's relief for a h e a r i n g on court entered an preliminary S e p t e m b e r 14, 2012, S a l e h f i l e d a notice of g r a n t i n g the i n j u n c t i o n . c o u r t , which f o r lack for a a t r a n s f e r r e d the appeal 1975, Holmes court conducted c h a l l e n g i n g the order appealed with On A u g u s t 27, 2012, t h e t r i a l granting appeal served The t r i a l A u g u s t 27, 2012, a n d t h e t r i a l that Holmes O i l s o u g h t transferred of j u r i s d i c t i o n . to this the appeal He t o our Our supreme court, pursuant court t o A l a . Code 12-2-7(6). R u l e 4 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) , A l a . R. App. P., p r o v i d e s f o r a p p e l l a t e review as o f r i g h t from "any i n t e r l o c u t o r y order granting, c o n t i n u i n g , m o d i f y i n g , r e f u s i n g , o r d i s s o l v i n g an i n j u n c t i o n , or r e f u s i n g t o d i s s o l v e o r t o m o d i f y an i n j u n c t i o n . " Rule 4(a)(1) also interlocutory order provides granting within 14 d a y s o f t h e e n t r y appeal from the order that an an appeal injunction of the order. g r a n t i n g Holmes 2 Oil's shall Saleh However, from be an filed d i d not request for a 2111236 p r e l i m i n a r y i n j u n c t i o n w i t h i n t h e 14-day t i m e l i m i t p r e s c r i b e d in Rule 4(a)(1). the to filing the Miller this Therefore, h i s appeal i s untimely. o f a t i m e l y n o t i c e o f an exercise of P r o p s . , LLC this court's court lacks j u r i s d i c t i o n appeal i s a p r e r e q u i s i t e appellate v. G r e e n , 958 So. Because jurisdiction, 2d 850, 851 over Saleh's appeal see ( A l a . 2006), challenging t h e t r i a l c o u r t ' s A u g u s t 27, 2012, o r d e r g r a n t i n g Holmes O i l ' s request Therefore, for injunctive appeal i s untimely, we relief. dismiss the because Saleh's appeal. APPEAL DISMISSED. Thompson, P . J . , and Pittman, concur. 3 M o o r e , and Donaldson, J J . ,

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.