Kristina Lynn Cagle v. Robert Cameron Cagle and Carol Denise Cagle (Appeal from Winston Circuit Court: DR-11-17) Affirmed. No Opinion.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

REL: 7/27/12 Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o f o r m a l r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e R e p o r t e r o f D e c i s i o n s , A l a b a m a A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1 ((334) 2 2 9 - 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may b e made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r . ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS SPECIAL TERM, 2012 2110118 Kristina Lynn Cagle v. Robert Cameron Cagle and C a r o l Denise Cagle Appeal from Winston C i r c u i t Court (DR-11-17) BRYAN, J u d g e . AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See 53(a)(1) Gonzalez 883 Rule and (a)(2)(F), A l a . R. App. P.; v . B l u e C r o s s / B l u e S h i e l d o f A l a b a m a , 760 So. 2 d 878, ( A l a . C i v . App. 2 0 0 0 ) . 2110118 Thompson, P . J . , a n d P i t t m a n a n d Thomas, J J . , c o n c u r . Moore, J . , d i s s e n t s , w i t h writing. 2 2110118 MOORE, J u d g e , d i s s e n t i n g . I r e s p e c t f u l l y d i s s e n t from the main o p i n i o n ' s of the trial court's Kristina Lynn affirmance judgment. Cagle ("the mother") appeals from j u d g m e n t d i v o r c i n g h e r f r o m R o b e r t Cameron C a g l e t o t h e that i t awarded intervenor, Carol grandmother. brief the that Denise I conclude evidence before there award of the of was not this clear that court's the the and children mother's and 2008). j u d g m e n t and proceedings. 3 mother that to support Serio, Therefore, remand t h e the evidence v. her s u f f i c i e n c y of f o r c u s t o d y so as Serio the paternal argument i n I agree w i t h convincing extent to children's i s s u e of the a nonparent. 9 3 8 - 3 9 ( A l a . C i v . App. trial parties' the court, u n f i t or u n s u i t e d custody to the Cagle, i s s u f f i c i e n t to place m o t h e r was 937, custody a 3 So. the an 3d I would reverse cause f o r further

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.