West Fraser, Inc. v. Windell Caldwell, Sr.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

REL: 08/17/2012 Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o formal r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e Reporter o f Decisions, Alabama A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1 ((334) 2 2 9 - 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may b e made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r . ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS SPECIAL TERM, 2012 2100696 West F r a s e r , Inc. v. Windell Caldwell, Sr. Appeal from Lee C i r c u i t (CV-10-900048) Court A f t e r Remand f r o m t h e A l a b a m a Supreme Court MOORE, J u d g e . The p r i o r j u d g m e n t o f t h i s c o u r t h a s b e e n r e v e r s e d , a n d t h e c a u s e remanded b y t h e Supreme C o u r t o f A l a b a m a . Caldwell, [Ms. 1100513, J u l y 20, 2012] So. 3d Ex p a r t e (Ala. 2100696 2012). On remand t o t h i s Supreme Court's opinion, hereby court, and i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e the judgment o f the t r i a l court i s affirmed. AFFIRMED. Thompson, P . J . , and Pittman, concur. 2 Bryan, and Thomas, J J . ,

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.