T. C. v. C. E.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Rel:
03/23/2012
Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o formal r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance
s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r .
R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e Reporter o f Decisions,
Alabama A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s ,
300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1
((334)
2 2 9 - 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may b e made
b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r .
ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS
OCTOBER TERM, 2011-2012
2080763
T.C.
v.
C.E.
Appeal from Baldwin J u v e n i l e Court
(JU-06-448.02 and JU-06-449.02)
A f t e r Remand f r o m t h e A l a b a m a Supreme
Court
PITTMAN, J u d g e .
The p r i o r j u d g m e n t o f t h i s c o u r t , s e e T.C. v . C.E.,
2080763, M a r c h 25, 2011]
has been v a c a t e d
So. 3 d
on c e r t i o r a r i
review.
[Ms.
( A l a . C i v . App. 2 0 1 1 ) ,
See Ex p a r t e C.E.,
2080763
[Ms.
1090624, J u l y 29, 2011] ___ So. 3d ___
compliance
w i t h Ex p a r t e C.E., we h e r e b y
( A l a . 2011).
In
dismiss the appeal
t a k e n i n t h i s cause w i t h i n s t r u c t i o n s t o t h e j u v e n i l e c o u r t t o
v a c a t e i t s judgment and t o d i s m i s s t h e case.
APPEAL DISMISSED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
Thompson,
P . J . , and
Bryan,
concur.
2
Thomas,
and
Moore, J J . ,
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
