If you are unable to see this message, click here to view it in a web browser.

Justia Argument Summaries

US Supreme Court

The Court heard oral arguments in the following cases this session:

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP

speaker-icon Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America (Argued 10/3/2023)

Does the funding scheme for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which receives funding directly from the Federal Reserve, violate the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution?

Advocates:
Elizabeth B. Prelogar, for the Petitioners
Noel J. Francisco, for the Respondents

speaker-icon Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer (Argued 10/4/2023)

Does an ADA “tester” have Article III standing to challenge a hotel’s failure to provide disability accessibility information on its website, even if she has no plans to visit the hotel?

Advocates:
Adam G. Unikowsky, for the Petitioner
Erica L. Ross, for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting neither party
Kelsi B. Corkran, for the Respondent

speaker-icon Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC (Argued 10/10/2023)

Is a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract unenforceable if enforcement would conflict with the “strong public policy” of the state whose law is displaced?

Advocates:
Jeffrey B. Wall, for the Petitioner
Howard J. Bashman, for the Respondent

speaker-icon Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC (Argued 10/10/2023)

Under 18 U.S.C. § 1514A, must a whistleblower prove his employer acted with “retaliatory intent” as part of his case in chief?

Advocates:
Easha Anand, for the Petitioner
Anthony A. Yang, for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner
Eugene Scalia, for the Respondents

speaker-icon Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP (Argued 10/11/2023)

Does the South Carolina legislature’s redistricting map, which has the effect of moving tens of thousands of Black voters to a different district, constitute an impermissible racial gerrymander, even if the legislators’ purported intent was merely a political gerrymander?

Advocates:
John M. Gore, for the Appellants
Leah C. Aden, for the Appellees
Caroline A. Flynn, for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting neither party

Listen to other Supreme Court oral arguments from 1955-Present at Oyez.org
Take Oyez on the road!
Justia

Contact Us| Privacy Policy

Unsubscribe From This Newsletter

or unsubscribe from all Justia newsletters immediately here.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Justia

Justia | 1380 Pear Ave #2B, Mountain View, CA 94043