Justia Daily Opinion Summaries

Arkansas Supreme Court Criminal Law Opinions
December 1, 2023

Table of Contents

White v. Payne

Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Government & Administrative Law

Cullen v. State

Criminal Law

Davis v. Payne

Criminal Law

Thompson v. Payne

Criminal Law

Browse upcoming and on-demand Justia Webinars

Arkansas Supreme Court Criminal Law Opinions Opinions

White v. Payne

Citation: 2023 Ark. 171

Opinion Date: November 30, 2023

Judge: Rhonda K. Wood

Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Government & Administrative Law

The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the circuit court dismissing Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, holding that the circuit court did not err in concluding that Petitioner had failed to state a ground for the writ.

Petitioner pled guilty to rape and aggravated robbery and was sentenced as a habitual offender. In his habeas corpus petition, Petitioner alleged that he was innocent of the offense of rape, that the State maliciously applied the habitual offender statute in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and that the Arkansas statute requiring that he serve 100 percent of his sentence was unconstitutional. The circuit court found that the claims were not cognizable in habeas and noted that parole eligibility falls within the domain of the executive branch. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the circuit court did not err.

Read Opinion

Are you a lawyer? Annotate this case.

Cullen v. State

Citation: 2023 Ark. 172

Opinion Date: November 30, 2023

Judge: Womack

Areas of Law: Criminal Law

The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the circuit court denying Appellant's petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, for extraordinary writ, and to set aside and vacate his judgment, holding that Appellant failed to allege facts to support his claim that he was entitled to an extraordinary writ or to have his sentence vacated.

Appellant pled guilty to second degree sexual assault and sentenced to seventy-two months' imprisonment. Appellant later filed a petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis seeking to file an extraordinary writ to change his sex-offender registration agency. Appellant also filed a motion to set aside or vacate judgment. The circuit court denied hisrelief. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that Appellant failed to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted and that the petitions failed to assert any grounds for which Appellant could successfully pursue those claims.

Read Opinion

Are you a lawyer? Annotate this case.

Davis v. Payne

Citation: 2023 Ark. 169

Opinion Date: November 30, 2023

Judge: Karen R. Baker

Areas of Law: Criminal Law

The Supreme Court dismissed Appellant's appeal from the dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. 16-112-101, holding that the circuit court properly dismissed the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Appellant was incarcerated in Jefferson County when he filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He was transferred to the East Arkansas Regional Unit in Lee County before the circuit court entered its order dismissing the petition. The Supreme Court dismissed this appeal, holding that a writ of habeas corpus issued by the Jefferson County Circuit Court could not be returned because Appellant was no longer within the court's jurisdiction.

Read Opinion

Are you a lawyer? Annotate this case.

Thompson v. Payne

Citation: 2023 Ark. 170

Opinion Date: November 30, 2023

Judge: Hudson

Areas of Law: Criminal Law

The Supreme Court dismissed Appellant's appeal from the dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus under Ark. Code Ann. 16-112-101, holding that the circuit court did not err in dismissing the petition.

The circuit court dismissed Appellant's habeas petition for lack of personal jurisdiction because Appellant was incarcerated in Lincoln County when he initially filed his petition but was transferred to the Grimes Unit in Jackson County before the court entered its order. The Supreme Court dismissed Appellant's appeal, which rendered his motions for default judgment and to make a ruling moot, holding that a writ of habeas corpus issued by the Lincoln County Circuit Court could not be returned because he was no longer within its jurisdiction.

Read Opinion

Are you a lawyer? Annotate this case.

About Justia Daily Opinion Summaries

Justia Daily Opinion Summaries is a free newsletter service with over 65 newsletters covering every federal appellate court and the highest court in each U.S. state.

Justia also provides weekly practice area newsletters in 60+ different practice areas. All daily and weekly Justia Newsletters are free. You may request newsletters or modify your preferences by visiting daily.justia.com.

Please note that some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on any summary for legal research purposes.

You may freely redistribute this email in whole.

About Justia

Justia’s mission is to make law and legal resources free for all.

New on Justia Onward

Want instant updates? Get Notified

Explore the Crossroads of Legal and Business Ethics in the AI Era

Justia Team

onward post

In an era dominated by continuously changing technology, artificial intelligence has made a splash as the latest wave of change. With this change, professionals in various industries face new ethical considerations. Join Justia Webinars for an upcoming program exploring the intersection of legal and business ethics in an evolving AI landscape.

Read More

Justia

Contact Us| Privacy Policy

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn LinkedIn Justia

Unsubscribe from this newsletter

Justia | 1380 Pear Ave #2B, Mountain View, CA 94043


Unsubscribe from all Justia Newsletters