2010 Tennessee Code
Title 36 - Domestic Relations
Chapter 6 - Child Custody and Visitation
Part 2 - Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act
36-6-234 - Order for immediate physical custody Fees, costs and expenses Party refusal to testify Husband and wife communications as evidence.

36-6-234. Order for immediate physical custody Fees, costs and expenses Party refusal to testify Husband and wife communications as evidence.

(a)  Unless the court issues a temporary emergency order pursuant to § 36-6-219, upon a finding that a petitioner is entitled to immediate physical custody of the child, the court shall order that the petitioner may take immediate physical custody of the child unless the respondent establishes that:

     (1)  The child-custody determination has not been registered and confirmed under § 36-6-229 and that:

          (A)  The issuing court did not have jurisdiction under this part;

          (B)  The child-custody determination for which enforcement is sought has been vacated, stayed, or modified by a court of a state having jurisdiction to do so under this part; or

          (C)  The respondent was entitled to notice, but notice was not given in accordance with the standards of § 36-6-211, in the proceedings before the court that issued the order for which enforcement is sought; or

     (2)  The child-custody determination for which enforcement is sought was registered and confirmed under § 36-6-229 but has been vacated, stayed, or modified by a court of a state having jurisdiction to do so under this part.

(b)  The court shall award the fees, costs, and expenses authorized under § 36-6-236 and may grant additional relief, including a request for the assistance of law enforcement officials, and set a further hearing to determine whether additional relief is appropriate.

(c)  If a party called to testify refuses to answer on the ground that the testimony may be self-incriminating, the court may draw an adverse inference from the refusal.

(d)  A privilege against disclosure of communications between spouses and a defense of immunity based on the relationship of husband and wife or parent and child may not be invoked in a proceeding under this part.

[Acts 1999, ch. 389, § 35.]