2018 New Mexico Statutes
Chapter 55 - Uniform Commercial Code
Article 2 - Sales
Section 55-2-606 - What constitutes acceptance of goods.
(1) Acceptance of goods occurs when the buyer:
(a) after a reasonable opportunity to inspect the goods signifies to the seller that the goods are conforming or that he will take or retain them in spite of their nonconformity; or
(b) fails to make an effective rejection (Subsection (1) of Section 2-602 [55-2-602 NMSA 1978]), but such acceptance does not occur until the buyer has had a reasonable opportunity to inspect them; or
(c) does any act inconsistent with the seller's ownership; but if such act is wrongful as against the seller it is an acceptance only if ratified by him.
(2) Acceptance of a part of any commercial unit is acceptance of that entire unit.
History: 1953 Comp., § 50A-2-606, enacted by Laws 1961, ch. 96, § 2-606.
OFFICIAL COMMENTS
UCC Official Comments by ALI & the NCCUSL. Reproduced with permission of the PEB for the UCC. All rights reserved.
Prior uniform statutory provision. — Section 48, Uniform Sales Act.
Changes. — Rewritten, the qualification in Paragraph (c) and Subsection (2) being new; otherwise the general policy of the prior legislation is continued.
Purposes of changes and new matter. — To make it clear that:
1. Under this article "acceptance" as applied to goods means that the buyer, pursuant to the contract, takes particular goods which have been appropriated to the contract as his own, whether or not he is obligated to do so, and whether he does so by words, action, or silence when it is time to speak. If the goods conform to the contract, acceptance amounts only to the performance by the buyer of one part of his legal obligation.
2. Under this article acceptance of goods is always acceptance of identified goods which have been appropriated to the contract or are appropriated by the contract. There is no provision for "acceptance of title" apart from acceptance in general, since acceptance of title is not material under this article to the detailed rights and duties of the parties. (See Section 2-401). The refinements of the older law between acceptance of goods and of title become unnecessary in view of the provisions of the sections on effect and revocation of acceptance, on effects of identification and on risk of loss, and those sections which free the seller's and buyer's remedies from the complications and confusions caused by the question of whether title has or has not passed to the buyer before breach.
3. Under Paragraph (a), payment made after tender is always one circumstance tending to signify acceptance of the goods but in itself it can never be more than one circumstance and is not conclusive. Also, a conditional communication of acceptance always remains subject to its expressed conditions.
4. Under Paragraph (c), any action taken by the buyer, which is inconsistent with his claim that he has rejected the goods, constitutes an acceptance. However, the provisions of Paragraph (c) are subject to the sections dealing with rejection by the buyer which permit the buyer to take certain actions with respect to the goods pursuant to his options and duties imposed by those sections, without effecting an acceptance of the goods. The second clause of Paragraph (c) modifies some of the prior case law and makes it clear that "acceptance" in law based on the wrongful act of the acceptor is acceptance only as against the wrongdoer and then only at the option of the party wronged.
In the same manner in which a buyer can bind himself, despite his insistence that he is rejecting or has rejected the goods, by an act inconsistent with the seller's ownership under Paragraph (c), he can obligate himself by a communication of acceptance despite a prior rejection under Paragraph (a). However, the sections on buyer's rights on improper delivery and on the effect of rightful rejection, make it clear that after he once rejects a tender, Paragraph (a) does not operate in favor of the buyer unless the seller has re-tendered the goods or has taken affirmative action indicating that he is holding the tender open. See also Comment 2 to Section 2-601.
5. Subsection (2) supplements the policy of the section on buyer's rights on improper delivery, recognizing the validity of a partial acceptance but insisting that the buyer exercise this right only as to whole commercial units.
Point 2: Sections 2-401, 2-509, 2-510, 2-607, 2-608 and Part 7.
Point 4: Sections 2-601 through 2-604.
Point 5: Section 2-601.
"Buyer". Section 2-103.
"Commercial unit". Section 2-105.
"Goods". Section 2-105.
"Seller". Section 2-103.
Rights upon revocation of acceptance. — Buyer who justifiably revokes his acceptance has the same right to rescission as though he had rejected the goods in the first place. Grandi v. LeSage, 1965-NMSC-017, 74 N.M. 799, 399 P.2d 285.
Items not properly rejected are accepted. — Where buyer fails to properly reject all but certain specific items, those items not rejected are accepted. Celebrity, Inc. v. Kemper, 1981-NMSC-084, 96 N.M. 508, 632 P.2d 743.
Reasonable time to reject determined by circumstances. — Absent a specific provision in a sales contract, a buyer has a reasonable time within which to determine whether or not the goods are defective, and the time depends upon all the circumstances surrounding the transaction. The actions of the parties may affect what is deemed to constitute a "reasonable time." O'Shea v. Hatch, 1982-NMCA-013, 97 N.M. 409, 640 P.2d 515.
Three-month delay in rejection not seasonable notice. — Where buyer fails to reject the entire shipment of goods until three months after seller's salesman refused to make requested adjustments for those goods rejected by buyer, the buyer has failed to give seller seasonable and particular notice of rejection as to the entire shipment and is precluded from rejecting any goods other than those originally set aside and presented to salesman. Celebrity, Inc. v. Kemper, 1981-NMSC-084, 96 N.M. 508, 632 P.2d 743.
Acceptance by actions inconsistent with seller's ownership is question of fact. — Whether a buyer accepts goods by subsequent acts inconsistent with the seller's ownership is a question of fact to be determined from the evidence in each particular case. O'Shea v. Hatch, 1982-NMCA-013, 97 N.M. 409, 640 P.2d 515.
Actions that are not acceptance. — Buyer's use of the seller's labels did not amount to acceptance where the buyer effectively rejected all the labels and the seller refused to accept return of the goods; the buyer acted in accordance with the seller's instructions to use the defective labels until it could resolve the problem. Credit Inst. v. Veterinary Nutrition Corp., 2003-NMCA-010, 133 N.M. 248, 62 P.3d 339.
Material alteration of goods by buyer will void a prior revocation of acceptance. O'Shea v. Hatch, 1982-NMCA-013, 97 N.M. 409, 640 P.2d 515.
Law reviews. — For article, "Buyers and Sellers of Goods in Bankruptcy," see 1 N.M. L. Rev. 435 (1971).
For annual survey of New Mexico law relating to commercial law, see 13 N.M.L. Rev. 293 (1983).
For article, "Out of sight but not out of mind: New Mexico's tax on out-of-state services," see 20 N.M.L. Rev. 501 (1990).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 72 Am. Jur. 2d Statute of Frauds §§ 130, 155, 157.
Contractual provision making acceptance conditional on approval by, or satisfaction of, third person, 46 A.L.R. 864.
Acceptance as affected by cancellation of contract before goods were shipped, 113 A.L.R. 810.
Buyer's acceptance of delayed or defective installment of goods as waiver of similar default as to later installments, 32 A.L.R.2d 1117.
Reasonableness of personal judgment of buyer as test where goods are sold subject to being satisfactory to the buyer, 86 A.L.R.2d 200.
77A C.J.S. Sales § 189 et seq.
