2005 Minnesota Statutes - 103F.215 — Model ordinance as county ordinance.

     103F.215 Model ordinance as county ordinance. 


    Subdivision 1.    County ordinance failing to meet 
 standards.  The commissioner shall adapt the model ordinance 
 to a county if, after notice and hearing as provided in section 
 103G.311, the commissioner finds that a county has failed to 
 adopt a shoreland conservation ordinance or that a county has 
 adopted a shoreland conservation ordinance that fails to meet 
 the minimum standards established under section 103F.211.  


    Subd. 2.    Hearing.  The commissioner shall hold at 
 least one public hearing on the proposed ordinance in the manner 
 provided in section 394.26, after giving notice as provided in 
 section 394.26.  The ordinance is effective for the county on 
 the date and in accordance with any rules the commissioner 
 prescribes, by order, relating to compliance.  


    Subd. 3.    Enforcement.  The ordinance must be enforced 
 as provided in section 394.37.  The penalties provided in 
 section 394.37 apply to violations of the commissioner's model 
 ordinance for the county.  


    Subd. 4.    Commissioner's costs.  The cost incurred by 
 the commissioner in adapting the model ordinance to a county 
 under this section must be paid by the county after the 
 commissioner submits an itemized statement of the costs to the 
 county.  If the county fails to pay the costs within 90 days 
 after the commissioner's statement is received, the commissioner 
 may file a copy of the statement of the costs for collection by 
 special tax levy with the county auditor.  The county auditor, 
 upon receiving a statement from the commissioner, shall include 
 the amount of the state's claim in the tax levy for general 
 revenue purposes of the county.  On completion of the tax 
 settlement following this levy, the county treasurer must pay 
 the amount due to the state to the commissioner for deposit in 
 the state treasury.  


    HIST: 1990 c 391 art 6 s 28; 1991 c 199 art 1 s 17; 1995 c 218 
 s 1