2006 Indiana Code - CHAPTER 3. DUTIES OF THE COURT
IC 35-33.5-3Chapter 3. Duties of the Court
IC 35-33.5-3-1
Authorization of warrant or extension; determinations by court;
examinations under oath; in camera inquiries
35-33.5-3-1 Sec. 1. (a) A court may enter an order authorizing a
warrant or an extension if, based on the facts submitted by an
applicant, the court determines the following:
(1) Probable cause exists to believe that the person whose
communications are to be intercepted is committing, has
committed, or may commit a designated offense.
(2) Communications concerning the designated offense
identified in the warrant application are likely to be obtained
through the requested interception.
(3) Exigent circumstances are present that require the
preservation of secrecy where there is a reasonable likelihood
that a continuing investigation would be prevented if a person
subject to investigation was alerted to the fact that the
investigation was occurring.
(4) A place or facility from which communications are to be
intercepted is:
(A) being used or about to be used by;
(B) listed in the name of;
(C) leased to; or
(D) commonly used by;
a person who is committing, has committed, or may commit a
designated offense.
(5) Investigative procedures:
(A) have been tried but have failed;
(B) are unlikely to succeed; or
(C) are too dangerous to attempt.
(b) In making a determination of probable cause required under
subsection (a)(1) before a warrant may be issued by the court, the
court may examine under oath any person. The court shall order the
court reporter to:
(1) prepare a verbatim transcript of an examination made under
this subsection; and
(2) attach the transcript to the application for the warrant.
(c) In making a determination of probable cause required under
subsection (a)(1) before a warrant may be issued by the court, if
there is no corroborative evidence offered in support of the allegation
of probable cause, the court shall inquire in camera concerning:
(1) the identity of any informants; or
(2) any additional information the court considers relevant to a
determination of probable cause to believe that the person
whose communications are to be intercepted is committing, has
committed, or may commit a designated offense.
(d) The court may modify the application and authorize a warrant
or an extension that is more limited in authority for interception than
the warrant or extension that was requested by the applicant.
As added by P.L.161-1990, SEC.3.
IC 35-33.5-3-2
Information required in warrant
35-33.5-3-2 Sec. 2. A court that issues a warrant or an extension
shall specify the following information in the warrant:
(1) The identity of the law enforcement agency that the warrant
directs to make the interception.
(2) The identity of the person, if known, whose communication
is to be intercepted.
(3) The nature and location of the facility or place from which
the communication is to be intercepted.
(4) The type of communication to be intercepted and a
statement of the designated offense to which the communication
relates.
(5) That the interception must be conducted in a manner that
minimizes the interception of communication that:
(A) is not relevant to the designated offense; and
(B) is not authorized by the warrant or extension.
(6) That methods required by the court to minimize the
interception of irrelevant communications include the
immediate termination by a law enforcement officer of the
recording of a communication that is clearly irrelevant to the
investigation of a designated offense.
(7) The duration during which the interception is authorized,
including a statement as to whether the interception
automatically terminates once the described communication is
initially obtained.
As added by P.L.161-1990, SEC.3.
IC 35-33.5-3-3
Automatic review of issuance; warrant stayed; extension
excepted
35-33.5-3-3 Sec. 3. (a) If a court grants a warrant under this
article, the prosecuting attorney shall apply to the court of appeals
for an ex parte de novo review of the issuing court's decision.
Issuance of the warrant is subject to automatic review and shall be
given priority over all other cases. The prosecuting attorney is
entitled to expedited review of the issuance of the warrant under
rules adopted by the supreme court. Notwithstanding IC 33-25-1-5,
the chief judge of the court of appeals shall assign these cases for
review to a district other than the district where the circuit or
superior court that granted the warrant is located.
(b) In the review, the court of appeals shall review the reasons for
the issuance of the warrant and determine whether the requirements
of this article have been met.
(c) The court of appeals may affirm, modify, or overrule the order
of the court to which the application was made. The court of appeals
may not increase the authority for interception beyond that requested
in the application.
(d) A warrant must be stayed until the court of appeals completes
the review.
(e) Issuance of an extension is not subject to automatic review
under this section.
As added by P.L.161-1990, SEC.3. Amended by P.L.98-2004,
SEC.143.
Disclaimer: These codes may not be the most recent version. Indiana may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.