2020 Hawaii Revised Statutes
Title 36. Civil Remedies and Defenses and Special Proceedings
658A. Uniform Arbitration Act
- 658A-1 Definitions.
- 658A-2 Notice.
- 658A-3 When chapter applies
- 658A-4 Effect of agreement to arbitrate; nonwaivable provisions
- 658A-5 Application for judicial relief
- 658A-6 Validity of agreement to arbitrate
- 658A-7 Motion to compel or stay arbitration
- 658A-8 Provisional remedies
- 658A-9 Initiation of arbitration
- 658A-10 Consolidation of separate arbitration proceedings
- 658A-11 Appointment of arbitrator; service as a neutral arbitrator
- 658A-12 Disclosure by arbitrator
- 658A-13 Action by majority
- 658A-14 Immunity of arbitrator; competency to testify; attorney's fees and costs
- 658A-15 Arbitration process
- 658A-16 Representation by lawyer
- 658A-17 Witnesses; subpoenas; depositions; discovery
- 658A-18 Judicial enforcement of pre-award ruling by arbitrator
- 658A-19 Award
- 658A-20 Change of award by arbitrator
- 658A-21 Remedies; fees and expenses of arbitration proceeding
- 658A-22 Confirmation of award
- 658A-23 Vacating award
- 658A-24 Modification or correction of award
- 658A-25 Judgment on award; attorney's fees and litigation expenses
- 658A-26 Jurisdiction
- 658A-27 Venue
- 658A-28 Appeals
- 658A-29 Relationship to Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act
Case Notes
Where appellant was already bound by an arbitration agreement executed on February 24, 2000, and therefore the post-July 1, 2002 arbitration agreement was not a "new" arbitration agreement that would dictate the application of this chapter to the arbitration proceedings, 658A-3(a) was inapplicable to the case. 113 H. 127, 149 P.3d 495 (2006).
Where arbitration between the State and union representing state employees was statutorily mandated arbitration pursuant to 89-11(e), and not a voluntary agreement to arbitrate, the Hawaii labor relations board had original jurisdiction over the parties' dispute pursuant to 89-14; circuit court did not have jurisdiction pursuant to this chapter because this chapter was inapplicable. 134 H. 489, 345 P.3d 155 (2015).
To the extent that there may be a conflict between the jurisdictional provisions of this chapter and chapter 89, chapter 89 takes precedence over this chapter. 132 H. 492 (App.), 323 P.3d 136 (2014).
