2021 Georgia Code
Title 19 - Domestic Relations
Chapter 11 - Enforcement of Duty of Support
Article 2 - Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act


Editor's notes.

- See O.C.G.A. § 19-11-40.1 for applicability of this article.

Law reviews.

- For article, "Georgia Inheritance Rights of Children Born Out of Wedlock," see 23 Ga. St. B.J. 28 (1986). For article, "Georgia's Constitutional Scheme for State Appellate Jurisdiction," see 6 Ga. St. B.J. 24 (2001).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Constitutionality.

- Ga. L. 1958, p. 34 (see now O.C.G.A. Art. 2, Ch. 11, T. 19) does not deny due process of law in violation of federal and state Constitutions. Dansby v. Dansby, 222 Ga. 118, 149 S.E.2d 252 (1966).

Support award in URESA action may vary from prior decree.

- Since the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, O.C.G.A. § 19-11-40 et seq., is an independent proceeding which does not affect, and is not bound by, prior foreign judgments, a responding court may enter a support order that is greater than, as well as less than, a prior judgment. State ex rel. McKenna v. McKenna, 253 Ga. 6, 315 S.E.2d 885 (1984).

Cited in Lamb v. Lamb, 241 Ga. 545, 246 S.E.2d 665 (1978); Helms v. Jones, 621 F.2d 211 (5th Cir. 1980); Woodes v. Morris, 247 Ga. 771, 279 S.E.2d 704 (1981); East v. Pike, 163 Ga. App. 375, 294 S.E.2d 597 (1982).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Treaty not prerequisite to recognizing foreign country as reciprocating state.

- Treaty between United States and a foreign country permitting reciprocal enforcement of child support obligations is not a prerequisite to recognizing that country as a reciprocating state under O.C.G.A. Art. 2, Ch. 11, T. 19. 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-12.

Reciprocal child support enforcement acts not violative of U.S. Constitution treaty provisions.

- So long as a reciprocal child support enforcement statute does not require more than a routine review of foreign laws, does not directly affect United States foreign policy, and does not have the potential for disruption of foreign policy or embarrassment to the United States government, the statute does not violate treaty provisions of the United States Constitution (U.S. Const., Art. I, Sec. X, Cl. I and U.S. Const., Art. II, Sec. II, Cl. II). 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-12.

Superior court may not transfer proceeding to juvenile court.

- Superior court may not transfer a Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, O.C.G.A. § 19-11-40 et seq., proceeding to the juvenile court under O.C.G.A. § 15-11-6(b). 1989 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U89-7.

Disclaimer: These codes may not be the most recent version. Georgia may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.