2020 Georgia Code
Title 16 - Crimes and Offenses
Chapter 12 - Offenses Against Public Health and Morals
Article 3 - Obscenity and Related Offenses
Part 3 - Sale or Distribution of Harmful Materials to Minors
§ 16-12-103. Selling, Loaning, Distributing, or Exhibiting; Duties of Video Game Retailers

1. It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to sell or loan for monetary consideration or otherwise furnish or disseminate to a minor:
   1. Any picture, photograph, drawing, sculpture, motion picture film, or similar visual representation or image of a person or portion of the human body which depicts sexually explicit nudity, sexual conduct, or sadomasochistic abuse and which is harmful to minors; or
   2. Any book, pamphlet, magazine, printed matter however reproduced, or sound recording which contains any matter enumerated in paragraph (1) of this subsection, or explicit and detailed verbal descriptions or narrative accounts of sexual excitement, sexual conduct, or sadomasochistic abuse and which, taken as a whole, is harmful to minors.
2. 1. It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to sell or furnish to a minor an admission ticket or pass or knowingly to admit a minor to premises whereon there is exhibited a motion picture, show, or other presentation which, in whole or in part, depicts sexually explicit nudity, sexual conduct, or sadomasochistic abuse and which is harmful to minors or exhibit any such motion picture at any such premises which are not designed to prevent viewing from any public way of such motion picture by minors not admitted to any such premises.
   2. It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to sell or to furnish to a person under the age of 21 an admission ticket or pass or knowingly to admit a person under the age of 21 to premises whereon there is exhibited a show or performance which is harmful to minors and which, in whole or in part, consists of sexually explicit nudity on the part of one or more live performers; sexual conduct on the part of one or more live performers; or sadomasochistic abuse on the part of one or more live performers.
3. It shall be unlawful for any person to falsely represent his or her age to any person mentioned in subsection (a) or subsection (b) of this Code section or to his or her agent with the intent to unlawfully procure any material set forth in subsection (a) of this Code section or with the intent to unlawfully procure such person's admission to any motion picture, show, or other presentation, as set forth in subsection (b) of this Code section.
4. It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to make a false representation to any person mentioned in subsection (a) or subsection (b) of this Code section or to his or her agent that he or she is the parent or guardian of any minor or knowingly to make a false representation with respect to the age of another person with the intent to unlawfully procure for such other person any material set forth in subsection (a) of this Code section or with the intent to unlawfully procure such other person's admission to any motion picture, show, or other presentation, as set forth in subsection (b) of this Code section.
5. It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to exhibit, expose, or display in public at newsstands or any other business or commercial establishment or at any other public place frequented by minors or where minors are or may be invited as part of the general public:
   1. Any picture, photograph, drawing, sculpture, motion picture film, or similar visual representation or image of a person or portion of the human body which depicts sexually explicit nudity, sexual conduct, or sadomasochistic abuse and which is harmful to minors; or
   2. Any book, pamphlet, magazine, printed matter however reproduced, or sound recording which contains any matter enumerated in paragraph (1) of this subsection, or explicit and detailed verbal descriptions or narrative accounts of sexual excitement, sexual conduct, or sadomasochistic abuse and which, taken as a whole, is harmful to minors.
6. 1. As used in this subsection, the term:
      1. "Video game" means an object or device that stores recorded data or instructions, receives data or instructions generated by a person who uses it, and, by processing the data or instructions, creates an interactive game capable of being played, viewed, or experienced on or through a computer, gaming system, console, or other technology.
      2. "Video game retailer" means a person who sells or rents video games to the public.
   2. Every video game retailer shall post a sign providing information to consumers about any video game rating system which appears on a video game offered by such retailer. The sign shall be posted in a conspicuous place within the portion of the establishment dedicated to the display or advertisement of video games. Each video game retailer shall make available to consumers, upon request, written information explaining each such rating system.
   3. A person violating the provisions of this subsection shall be punished with a civil fine in an amount not less than $250.00 and not more than $500.00 for each violation. Each day in violation of this subsection shall constitute a separate offense.

(Code 1981, §§16-12-103,16-12-104, enacted by Ga. L. 1983, p. 1437, § 2; Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, § 16; Ga. L. 1984, p. 1495, § 3; Ga. L. 1996, p. 273, § 2; Ga. L. 2005, p. 1261, § 1/SB 106.)

- The provisions of the subsection (b) added by the second 1984 amendment were derived in great part from the provisions of former Code Section 16-12-104. See Editor's notes to that Code section.

Ga. L. 1996, p. 273, § 3, not codified by the General Assembly, provides for severability.

- For article on 2005 amendment of this Code section, see 22 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 57 (2005). For article, "'Sexting' to Minors in a Rapidly Evolving Digital Age: Frix v. State Establishes the Applicability of Georgia's Obscenity Statutes to Text Messages," see 61 Mercer L. Rev. 1283 (2010). For review of 1996 offenses against public health and morals legislation, see 13 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 116 (1996). For note, "Balancing the First Amendment and Child Protection Goals in Legal Approaches to Restricting Children's Access to Violent Video Games: A Comparison of Germany and the United States," see 34 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 743 (2006).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Constitutionality.

- O.C.G.A. § 16-12-103 produces only a slight burden on adults' access to protected material and fully comports with the First Amendment. American Booksellers v. Webb, 919 F.2d 1493 (11th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 941, 111 S. Ct. 2237, 114 L. Ed. 2d 479 (1991).

O.C.G.A. § 16-12-103(b)(2) is unconstitutional as an infringement on free speech rights without proof of a compelling state interest justifying such restriction applying to persons between 18 and 21 years of age. State v. Cafe Erotica, Inc., 269 Ga. 486, 500 S.E.2d 574 (1998).

- State is not prohibited from prosecuting a defendant for violating the exhibition and definition components of O.C.G.A. § 16-12-103, even though the display provision (subsection (e) ) has been declared unconstitutional. Windom v. State, 187 Ga. App. 18, 369 S.E.2d 311 (1988).

- When the O.C.G.A. § 16-12-103(a)(1) charge against the defendant was based on defendant's exhibiting to a minor an allegedly pornographic motion picture, and the jury was allowed to view a videotape of this motion picture, which was found during a search of defendant's home, but at some point during the showing of this film, defense counsel stipulated that the film was sexually explicit, and the remainder of the film was not shown to the jury, as a result of this truncation of the jury's view of the film, there was insufficient evidence under which the jury could have found defendant guilty of this charge since, in order to be adjudged obscene under O.C.G.A. § 16-12-103(a)(1), the work must depict sexually explicit nudity and be harmful to minors; in order to be adjudged harmful to minors, the work must meet the three-part test set out in O.C.G.A. § 16-12-102(1)(A), (B), and (C), and in order to determine whether the work meets the tests set out in subparagraphs (A) and (C) the work must be viewed "as a whole." Hunter v. State, 257 Ga. 571, 361 S.E.2d 787 (1987).

- Charging a defendant with showing an obscene film to a minor does not constitute an unconstitutional intrusion into defendant's right of personal privacy within the private and noncommercial boundaries of defendant's home. Hunter v. State, 257 Ga. 571, 361 S.E.2d 787 (1987).

- Sexually explicit text message sent to a minor via a cellular phone constitutes "printed matter however reproduced" under O.C.G.A. § 16-12-103(a)(2). Frix v. State, 298 Ga. App. 538, 680 S.E.2d 582 (2009).

As a person of ordinary intelligence would have fair notice that sending a sexually explicit text message to a minor via a cellular phone was unlawful under O.C.G.A. § 16-12-103, prosecuting the defendant for distribution of harmful materials to a minor based on such conduct did not violate due process. Frix v. State, 298 Ga. App. 538, 680 S.E.2d 582 (2009).

Placing material "harmful to minors" behind "blinder racks" or shelves which cover at least the lower two-thirds of material that would otherwise be exposed to view does not impose a "substantially overbroad" regulation on "conduct plus speech," where adults may peruse and purchase the material without restriction. American Booksellers v. Webb, 919 F.2d 1493 (11th Cir. 1990).

- In a prosecution against the defendant for child molestation, enticing a child for indecent purposes, and exhibiting pornography to a minor, even if the appeals court assumed that the word "catheter" should have been redacted from what the defendant apparently conceded was an otherwise relevant list of items found in a search, the trial court's failure to do so was harmless error because it was highly improbable that such failure contributed to the verdict given the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt. Goldey v. State, 289 Ga. App. 198, 656 S.E.2d 549 (2008).

- There was no merit to a defendant's contention that the defendant's conviction and felony sentence for child molestation were improper because the alleged conduct also violated O.C.G.A. § 16-12-103(a)(1), which makes it a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature to furnish or disseminate harmful material to a minor and, therefore, the defendant could only be prosecuted for the misdemeanor offense as the rule of lenity did not apply because the two offenses at issue required different conduct. Namely, the crime of child molestation required, among other things, proof of the intent to arouse or satisfy the sexual desires of either the child or the perpetrator, which was not a required element of the crime of furnishing or disseminating harmful material to a minor. Metts v. State, 297 Ga. App. 330, 677 S.E.2d 377 (2009).

Cited in American Booksellers Ass'n v. Webb, 590 F. Supp. 677 (N.D. Ga. 1984); American Booksellers Ass'n. v. Webb, 254 Ga. 399, 329 S.E.2d 495 (1985); Hollis v. State, 215 Ga. App. 35, 450 S.E.2d 247 (1994).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

- Obscenity prosecution: statutory exemption based on dissemination to persons or entities having scientific, educational, or similar justification for possession of such materials, 13 A.L.R.5th 567.

Constitutionality of state statutes banning distribution of sexual devices, 94 A.L.R.5th 497.