View Our Newest Version Here

2021 Florida Statutes
Title XLV - Torts
Chapter 774 - Asbestos-Related and Silica-Related Claims
Part II - Asbestos and Silica Compensation Fairness Act (Ss. 774.201-774.209)
774.208 - Liability rules applicable to protect sellers, renters, and lessors.

Universal Citation:
FL Stat § 774.208 (2021)
Learn more This media-neutral citation is based on the American Association of Law Libraries Universal Citation Guide and is not necessarily the official citation.
774.208 Liability rules applicable to protect sellers, renters, and lessors.—

(1)(a) In a civil action alleging an asbestos or silica claim, a product seller other than a manufacturer is liable to a plaintiff only if the plaintiff establishes that:

  1. 1.a. The product that allegedly caused the harm that is the subject of the complaint was sold, rented, or leased by the product seller;

  2. b. The product seller failed to exercise reasonable care with respect to the product; and

  3. c. The failure to exercise reasonable care was a proximate cause of the harm to the exposed person;

  4. 2.a. The product seller made an express warranty applicable to the product that allegedly caused the harm that is the subject of the complaint, independent of any express warranty made by the manufacturer as to the same product;

  5. b. The product failed to conform to the warranty; and

  6. c. The failure of the product to conform to the warranty caused the harm to the exposed person; or

  7. 3.a. The product seller engaged in intentional wrongdoing, as determined under the law of this state; and

  8. b. The intentional wrongdoing caused the harm that is the subject of the complaint.

(b) For the purpose of sub-subparagraph (a)1.b., a product seller may not be considered to have failed to exercise reasonable care with respect to a product based upon an alleged failure to inspect the product, if:

  1. 1. The failure occurred because there was no reasonable opportunity to inspect the product; or

  2. 2. The inspection, in the exercise of reasonable care, would not have revealed the aspect of the product which allegedly caused the exposed person’s impairment.

(2) In a civil action alleging an asbestos or silica claim, a person engaged in the business of renting or leasing a product is not liable for the tortious act of another solely by reason of ownership of that product.

History.—s. 8, ch. 2005-274; s. 108, ch. 2006-1.

Disclaimer: These codes may not be the most recent version. Florida may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.