2019 Delaware Code
Title 6 - Commerce and Trade
Chapter 50A. Farm Equipment Warranties
§ 5006A Alternative dispute settlement.
(a) Exhaustion required. — If a manufacturer has established, or participates in, an informal dispute settlement procedure which substantially complies with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Part 703, as amended, and the requirements of this section, the provisions of § 5004A of this title concerning refunds or replacement do not apply to a consumer who has not first used this procedure.
(b) Findings as evidence. — The findings and decisions in an informal dispute settlement procedure shall address and state in writing whether the consumer would be entitled to a refund or replacement under the presumptions and criteria set out in § 5004A of this title and are admissible as nonbinding evidence in any legal action and are not subject to further foundation requirements.
(c) Replacement or refund. — If, in an informal dispute settlement procedure, it is decided that a consumer is entitled to a replacement vehicle under subsection (d) of this section, then the consumer has the option of selecting and receiving either a replacement vehicle or a full refund as authorized by § 5004A of this title. Any refund selected by a consumer shall include all amounts authorized by § 5004A of this title.
(d) Requirements of informal dispute settlement procedure. — In any informal dispute settlement procedure provided for by this section:
(1) No documents shall be received by any informal dispute settlement arbitrators unless those documents have been provided to each of the parties in the dispute prior to the arbitrator’s meeting, with an opportunity for the parties to comment on the documents in writing, or with oral presentation at the request of the arbitrators;
(2) “Nonvoting” manufacturer or dealer representatives shall not attend or participate in the internal dispute settlement procedures unless the consumer is also present and given a chance to be heard, or unless the consumer previously consents to the manufacturer or dealer participation without the consumer’s presence and participation;
(3) Consumers shall be given an adequate opportunity to contest a manufacturer’s assertion that a nonconformity falls within intended specifications for the vehicle by having the basis of the manufacturer’s claim appraised by a technical expert selected and paid for by the consumer prior to the informal dispute settlement hearing;
(4) No disputes shall be heard where there has been a recent attempt by the manufacturer to repair a consumer’s vehicle, but no response has yet been received by the informal dispute arbitrators from the consumer as to whether the repairs were successfully completed. This provision shall not prejudice a consumer’s rights under this section nor shall it extend the informal dispute mechanism’s 40-day time limit for deciding disputes, as established by the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Part 703;
(5) The manufacturer shall provide and the informal dispute settlement arbitrators shall consider all information relevant to resolving the dispute, such as the prior dispute records and information required by the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Part 703.6, and any relevant technical service bulletins which may have been issued by the manufacturer or lessor regarding the motor vehicle being disputed; and
(6) Any decision reached under this section shall be binding on the manufacturer.
(e) Exhaustion not required. — No consumer shall be required to first participate in an informal dispute settlement procedure before filing an action in Superior Court if the informal dispute settlement procedure does not comply with the requirements of this section, notwithstanding the procedure’s compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Part 703.
(f) Civil remedy. — Any consumer injured by a violation of this section may bring a civil action to enforce this section and recover costs and disbursements including reasonable attorney’s fees.
(g) Affirmative defenses. — It shall be an affirmative defense to claim that:
(1) The alleged nonconformity does not substantially impair such use and market value; or
(2) A nonconformity is the result of abuse or neglect or of modifications or alterations of the farm tractor not authorized by the manufacturer.
66 Del. Laws, c. 57, § 1.
