2012 Connecticut General Statutes
Title 51 - Courts
Chapter 872 - Judges
Section 51-39 - Disqualification by relationship or interest. Judge or family support magistrate may act with consent of parties.


CT Gen Stat § 51-39 (2012) What's This?

(a) Except as provided in this section, a judge or family support magistrate is disqualified to act if a relationship between the judge or family support magistrate and a party in any proceeding in court before him is as near as the degree of kinship between father and son, brothers, or uncle and nephew, by nature or marriage, or as near as between landlord and tenant, or if any judge or family support magistrate may be liable to contribute to the damages, costs or expenses of any proceeding before him, or if he may receive a direct pecuniary benefit by the determination of any proceeding before him.

(b) A judge or family support magistrate shall not be disqualified to act in any proceeding by reason of his being a member of any ecclesiastical corporation, unless it is a party to the action, nor in any proceeding in which any town, city or borough is interested or is a party, by reason of his being an inhabitant thereof or liable to taxation therein or by reason of his being related to any taxpayer or inhabitant thereof.

(c) When any judge or family support magistrate is disqualified to act in any proceeding before him, he may act if the parties thereto consent in open court.

(1949 Rev., S. 7692–7694; P.A. 82-248, S. 20; P.A. 89-360, S. 22, 45.)

History: P.A. 82-248 made technical revision, rewording some provisions and dividing section into Subsecs. but made no substantive change; P.A. 89-360 applied provisions to family support magistrates.

Cited. 2 CA 551; Id., 650. Cited. 4 CA 504; Id., 669. Cited. 6 CA 576. Cited. 7 CA 435. Cited. 10 CA 422. Cited. 14 CA 645. Cited. 18 CA 207.

Subsec. (c):

Cited. 195 C. 202.

Cited. 9 CA 299. Cited. 13 CA 651.

No statutory or common law ground existed to disqualify judge who had, fifteen years previous, as parole board member ruled adversely on defendant’s request for parole. 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 669.

Disclaimer: These codes may not be the most recent version. Connecticut may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.