There is a newer version of the California Code
2005 California Education Code Sections 52055.600-52055.662 Article 3.5. High Priority Schools Grant Program ..
EDUCATION CODESECTION 52055.600-52055.662
52055.600. (a) The High Priority Schools Grant Program is hereby established. Participation in this program is voluntary. (b) From funds made available for purposes of this article, the Superintendent shall allocate a total of four hundred dollars ($400) per pupil, including funds received pursuant to Section 52054.5 or for the Comprehensive School Reform Demonstration Program (Public Law 105-78), to eligible schools for implementation of a school action plan approved pursuant to this article. (c) It is the intent of the Legislature that federal funding provided pursuant to the Comprehensive School Reform Demonstration Program (P.L. 105-78) supplement, not supplant, funding received pursuant to this article. (d) Funds received pursuant to this article may not be used to match funds received pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 52053). (e) The school district shall keep fiscal records available for inspection that affirm allocation to schoolsites in accordance with this section and shall allocate resources in a manner that does not delay their use. 52055.605. (a) The Superintendent, with the approval of the State Board of Education, shall identify schools ranked in deciles 1 to 5, inclusive, on the Academic Performance Index (API). (b) The Superintendent shall invite schools identified pursuant to subdivision (a) to participate in the High Priority Schools Grant Program. Notwithstanding subdivision (h) of Section 52053, in order to be eligible for funding from the High Priority Schools Grant Program, a school shall also participate in the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program. A school participating in both programs may elect to submit only one application and one plan for both programs. A school participating in the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program before the date of the enactment of the act adding this section is also eligible for participation in the High Priority Schools Grant Program. (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and if funds are available for this purpose, the Superintendent shall invite a second cohort of schools identified pursuant to subdivision (a) to participate in the High Priority Schools Grant Program beginning in the 2005-06 fiscal year. In order to be eligible for funding pursuant to this section, these schools shall not be required to also participate in the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Grant Program. (d) First priority for participation in the High Priority Schools Grant Program shall be given to schools ranked on the API in decile 1. Second priority shall be given to schools in decile 2. Third priority shall be given to schools in decile 3. Fourth priority shall be given to schools in decile 4. Fifth priority shall be given to schools in decile 5. Within each decile, priority shall be given to the lowest ranked schools. Schools that are receiving or have received funding pursuant to Section 52053, 52054.5, or 52055.600 are ineligible to participate in a second cohort of schools funded pursuant to subdivision (c). (e) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and if funds are available for this purpose, the number of schools within the designated cohorts of the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program pursuant to Section 52053 may exceed the maximum numbers specified in that section in order to participate in the program established pursuant to this article. (f) If a school ranked in decile 1 of the API completes the action plan required as part of the application to participate in the federal Comprehensive School Reform Demonstration Program (P.L. 105-78), but there are insufficient funds to allow that school to participate in that program, so long as the action plan meets the requirements of subdivisions (d) and (e) of Section 52054, that school shall be automatically approved to the extent funding is available for participation in the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program and shall be deemed to have complied with the requirements of Section 52054. (g) The State Board of Education may allow continuation high schools to apply for and receive funding pursuant to this article if those continuation high schools report pupil performance that is equivalent to that of high schools ranked in deciles 1 and 2 on the API and the board determines that the state will be able to adequately determine growth in pupil performance in a valid and reliable manner for the purpose of accountability pursuant to this article. The State Board of Education may establish a limit on the number of continuation high schools that may be funded to reflect their proportion of high-priority pupils in grades 9 to 12, inclusive, and may adopt criteria limiting the eligibility for funding, pursuant to this article, of continuation high schools with a high level of per pupil funding from the continuation high school revenue limit add-on. 52055.610. (a) The Superintendent shall establish a procedure that is consistent with this article for the approval of applications and school action plans. (b) Notwithstanding the existing application process established pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 52053), in developing an action plan to be submitted with the application for funding pursuant to this article, a school may choose from the following options: (1) A school district on behalf of an eligible school under its jurisdiction may elect to receive fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) as a planning grant from funds appropriated for purposes of this article. These planning grant funds shall be used for technical assistance in the development of the school action plan. Technical assistance includes assistance provided by school district personnel, county offices of education, universities, a state approved external evaluator, or any other entity that has proven successful expertise specific to the challenges inherent in high-priority schools. If the school action plan is approved, the Superintendent shall provide funding for its implementation. Planning grant funds, as well as other funds available to school districts pursuant to this article, may be used for ongoing technical assistance throughout the implementation of the action plan and continued participation in the program established pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 52053) and the program established pursuant to this article. (2) A school district, on behalf of an eligible school under its jurisdiction, may elect to forego the fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) planning grant and immediately submit its application and school action plan. If a school chooses this option, the Superintendent shall take one of the following actions: (A) Recommend approval of the application by the State Board of Education and action plan and provide funding for implementation of the school action plan. (B) Request additional clarification and technical changes, after which the school and district shall resubmit the application and school action plan with the clarifications and changes for approval. If the application and school action plan is approved, the Superintendent shall provide funding for implementation of the school action plan. (C) Disapprove the plan in which case a school district on behalf of an eligible school under its jurisdiction shall receive a fifty thousand dollar ($50,000) planning grant that shall be used for technical assistance in the redevelopment of the school action plan according to the department's recommendations. Technical assistance includes assistance provided by school district personnel, county offices of education, universities, a state approved external evaluator, or any other entity that has proven expertise specific to the challenges inherent in high-priority schools. (c) The following deadlines apply to the first cohort of schools in the 2001-02 fiscal year: (1) A school district on behalf of an eligible school under its jurisdiction shall submit the application and school action plan to the Superintendent for review and approval by May 15, 2002. (2) The Superintendent shall make a recommendation to the State Board of Education regarding approval or disapproval of applications and school action plans by June 15, 2002. The State Board of Education shall approve or disapprove the application and action plan by June 30, 2002. Upon approval by the State Board of Education, the department shall allocate funding to schools for the implementation of the action plan. If the State Board of Education fails to approve or disapprove the application and school action plan by June 30, 2002, the recommendation of the Superintendent shall be deemed to be adopted and funding for implementation of the action plan shall be allocated. (3) If the Superintendent takes the action specified in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), the school and school district shall resubmit the application and school action plan with the clarifications and changes for approval by August 1, 2002, and the Superintendent shall make a recommendation to the State Board of Education regarding approval or disapproval by September 1, 2002. The State Board of Education shall approve or disapprove the application and action plan by September 30, 2002. If the action plan is approved, the department shall allocate funding to the school district on behalf of an eligible school under its jurisdiction for implementation of the action plan. If the State Board of Education fails to approve or disapprove the application and school action plan by September 30, 2002, the recommendation of the Superintendent shall be deemed to be adopted and funding for implementation of the action plan is to be allocated. (4) A school district may request, and the State Board of Education may waive, the deadlines set forth in this subdivision. (d) The following deadlines apply for the second cohort of schools in the 2005-06 fiscal year: (1) A school district, on behalf of an eligible school under its jurisdiction, shall submit the application and school action plan to the Superintendent for review and approval by March 15, 2006. (2) (A) The Superintendent shall make a recommendation to the State Board of Education regarding approval or disapproval of applications and school action plans by June 15, 2006. (B) The State Board of Education shall approve or disapprove the application and action plan by June 30, 2006. Upon approval by the State Board of Education, the department shall allocate funding to schools for the implementation of the school action plan. If the State Board of Education fails to approve or disapprove the application and school action plan by June 30, 2006, the recommendation of the Superintendent shall be deemed to be adopted and funding for implementation of the school action plan shall be allocated. (3) If the Superintendent takes the action specified in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), the school district shall resubmit the application and school action plan with the clarifications and changes for approval by August 1, 2006, and the Superintendent shall make a recommendation to the State Board of Education regarding approval or disapproval by September 1, 2006. The State Board of Education shall approve or disapprove the application and the school action plan by September 30, 2006. If the school action plan is approved, the department shall allocate funding to the school district on behalf of an eligible school under its jurisdiction for implementation of the school action plan. If the State Board of Education fails to approve or disapprove the application and school action plan by September 30, 2006, the recommendation of the Superintendent shall be deemed to be adopted and funding for implementation of the school action plan shall be allocated. (4) A school district may request a waiver of, and the State Board of Education may waive, the deadlines established in this subdivision. (e) If a school receives implementation funding during the same fiscal year it receives a fifty thousand dollar ($50,000) planning grant, the planning grant shall be deducted from the amount of implementation funding provided to the school pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 52055.600. (f) Notwithstanding the deadlines specified in this section, if funding is made available for this purpose, the State Board of Education may approve additional applications in the 2002-03 and 2003-04 fiscal years from school districts that comply with the requirements of this article. 52055.615. (a) If the Superintendent of Public Instruction invites a school to participate in the High Priority Schools Grant Program, the governing board of the school district shall hold a public hearing at a regularly scheduled meeting to discuss whether or not to apply for participation in this program and how to address the needs of the school and pupils. (b) If a school district, on behalf of an eligible school under its jurisdiction, decides not to accept the invitation to participate in the High Priority Schools Grant Program, the governing board of the school district shall hold a public hearing at a regularly scheduled meeting to discuss the reasons and rationale for not accepting the invitation and explain how the district intends to address the needs of the school and pupils. This section does not apply to school districts with jurisdiction over schools for which the Superintendent of Public Instruction has indicated that funding would not be available. The governing board shall not place the discussion required pursuant to this subdivision on the consent calendar of the hearing. (c) The governing board shall notify, in writing, the following persons and entities of the public hearings required pursuant to subdivisions (a) and (b): (1) Representative parent organizations at the schoolsite, including the parent-teacher association, parent-teacher clubs, and schoolsite councils. The district is encouraged also to notify parents directly through appropriate means. Notifications to parents shall comply with Article 4 (commencing with Section 48985) of Chapter 6 of Part 27. (2) All local major media outlets. (3) The local mayor. (4) All members of the city council. (5) All members of the county board of supervisors. (6) County superintendents of schools. (7) County board of education. 52055.620. (a) As a condition of the receipt of funds, a school action plan shall be based upon the following: (1) It shall be based on scientifically based research, effective practices, and be data driven. (2) It shall include ongoing data gathering for the purposes of this program so that progress can be measured and verified and the plan can be modified based on the data. (3) It shall be grounded in the findings from an initial needs assessment. (4) It shall evidence a commitment by the school community to implement the plan. The plan shall describe how this commitment will be evidenced. (5) It shall make clear that there is a heightening of expectations on the part of all personnel associated with the schoolsite that all children can learn and every school can succeed. (6) It shall ensure that an environment that is conducive to teaching and learning is provided at the schoolsite. (7) It shall identify additional human, financial, and other resources available to the school to be used in the implementation of the school action plan. (b) (1) The action plan shall be developed, in partnership with the school district, by the schoolsite council, as defined in Section 52012, or if the school does not have a schoolsite council, by a schoolwide advisory group or school support group that conforms to the requirements of Section 52012 and whose members are self-selected. (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a school participating in the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program prior to the effective date of the act adding this section may continue using its school action team for purposes of developing an action plan pursuant to this article. (c) In developing a school action plan, the school and school district shall use the technical assistance from school district personnel, county offices of education, universities, a state approved external evaluator, or any other person or entity that has proven successful expertise specific to the challenges inherent in high-priority schools. In addition, the school and district may include an individual to facilitate the activities related to the development of this plan. (d) The action plan shall include a strategy, jointly developed by the school district and the exclusive bargaining representative of the certificated employees of the district, for addressing the distribution of experienced credentialed teachers throughout the district, including an agreement by the district and the exclusive bargaining representative of the certificated staff on how they are going to achieve a balance in that distribution. This collaboration shall take place outside of collective bargaining and shall strive to develop a strategy that will attract and retain equal ratios of credentialed teachers at each school in the district. This collaboration shall include discussions on ways to maximize current options to recruit credentialed teachers to the district, use of regional recruitment centers, ensuring that newly hired credentialed teachers are assigned in alignment with the goal of even distribution of credentialed teachers, and ensuring that high-priority schools provide a necessary teaching and learning environment to retain a fully credentialed teaching staff. (e) The action plan may include any existing plan a school may have developed for another program, that may include existing strategies that meet the requirements of the essential components of a school action plan specified in Section 52055.625. 52055.625. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature that the lists contained in paragraph (2) of subdivisions (c), (d), (e), and (f) be considered options that may be considered by a school in the development of its school action plan and that a school not be required to adopt all of the listed options as a condition of funding under the terms of this section. Instead, this listing of options is intended to provide the opportunity for focus and strategic planning as schools plan to address the needs of high-priority pupils. (b) (1) As a condition of the receipt of funds, a school action plan shall include each of the following essential components: (A) Pupil literacy and achievement. (B) Quality of staff. (C) Parental involvement. (D) Facilities, curriculum, instructional materials, and support services. (2) As a condition of the receipt of funds, a school action plan for a school initially applying to participate in the program on or after the 2004-05 fiscal year, shall include each of the following essential components: (A) Pupil literacy and achievement. (B) Quality of staff, including highly qualified teachers, as required by the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301 et seq.), and appropriately credentialed teachers for English learners. (C) Parental involvement. (D) Facilities maintained in good repair as specified in Sections 17014, 17032.5, 17070.75, and 17089, curriculum, instructional materials that are, at a minimum, consistent with the requirements of Section 60119, and support services. (c) (1) The pupil literacy and achievement component shall contain a strategy to focus on increasing pupil literacy and achievement, with necessary attention to the needs of English language learners. At a minimum, this strategy shall include a plan to achieve the following goals: (A) Each pupil at the school will be provided appropriate instructional materials aligned with the academic content and performance standards adopted by the State Board of Education as required by law. (B) Each significant subgroup at the school will demonstrate increased achievement based on API results by the end of the implementation period. (C) English language learners at the school will demonstrate increased performance based on the English language development test required by Section 60810 and the achievement tests required pursuant to Section 60640. (2) To achieve the goals in paragraph (1), a school in its action plan may include, among other things, any of the following options: (A) Selective class size reduction in key curricular areas provided this does not result in a decrease in the proportion of experienced credentialed teachers at the schoolsite. (B) Increased learning time in key curricular areas identified as needing attention, including mathematics. (C) Targeted intensive reading instruction utilizing reading capacity-level materials that may include, but are not limited to, the following strategies: (i) The development of a reading competency program for pupils in grades 5 to 8, inclusive, whose reading scores are at or below the 40th percentile or in the two lowest performance levels, as adopted by the State Board of Education, on the reading portion of the achievement test, authorized by Section 60640. This program may include direct instruction in reading at grade level utilizing the English language arts content standards adopted pursuant to Section 60605. Additionally, this program may offer specialized intervention that utilizes state approved instructional materials adopted pursuant to Section 60200. It is the intent of the Legislature, as a recommendation, that this curriculum consist of at least one class period during the regular schoolday taught by a teacher trained in the English language arts standards pursuant to Section 60605. It is also the intent of the Legislature, as a recommendation, that periodic assessments throughout the year be conducted to monitor the progress of the pupils involved. (ii) The use of a library media teacher to work cooperatively with every teacher and principal at the schoolsite to develop and implement an independent and free reading program, help teachers determine a pupil's reading level, order books that have been determined to meet the needs of pupils, help choose books at pupils' independent reading levels, and assure that pupils read a variety of genres across all academic content areas. For purposes of this article, "library media teacher" means a classroom teacher who possesses or is in the process of obtaining a library media teacher services credential consistent with Section 44868. (D) Mentoring programs for pupils. (E) Community, business, or university partnerships with the school. (d) (1) The quality of staff component shall contain a strategy to attract, retain, and fairly distribute the highest quality staff at the school, including teachers, administrators, and support staff. At a minimum, this strategy shall include a plan to achieve the following goals: (A) An increase in the number of credentialed teachers working at that schoolsite. (B) An increase in or targeting of professional development opportunities for teachers related to the goals of the action plan and English language development standards adopted by the State Board of Education aligned with the academic content and performance standards, including, but not limited to, participation in professional development institutes established pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 92220) of Chapter 5 of Part 65. (C) By the end of the implementation period, successful completion by the schoolsite administrators of a program designed to maximize leadership skills. (2) To achieve the goals in paragraph (1) a school may include in its action plan, among others, any of the following options: (A) Incentives to attract credentialed teachers and quality administrators to the schoolsite, including, but not limited to, additional compensation strategies similar to those authorized pursuant to Section 44735. (B) A school district preintern or intern program within which eligible emergency permit teachers located at the schoolsite would be required to participate, unless those individuals are already participating in another teacher preparation program that leads to the attainment of a valid California teaching credential. (C) Common planning time for teachers, administrators, and support staff focused on improving pupil achievement. (D) Mentoring for site administrators, peer assistance for credentialed teachers, and support services for new teachers, including, but not limited to, the Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment System. (E) Providing assistance and incentives to teachers for completion of professional certification programs and toward attaining BCLAD or CLAD certification. (F) Increasing professional development in state academic content and performance standards, including English language development standards. (e) (1) The parental involvement component shall contain a strategy to change the culture of the school community to recognize parents and guardians as partners in the education of their children and to prepare and educate parents and guardians in the learning and academic progress of their children. At a minimum, this strategy shall include a commitment to develop a school-parent compact as required by Section 51101 and a plan to achieve the goal of maintaining or increasing the number and frequency of personal parent and guardian contacts each year at the schoolsite and school-home communications designed to promote parent and guardian support for meeting state standards and core curriculum requirements. (2) To achieve the goals in subdivision (a), a school may in its action plan include, among others, any of the following options: (A) Parent and guardian homework support classes. (B) A program of regular home visits. (C) After school and evening opportunities for parents, guardians, and pupils to learn together. (D) Training programs to educate parents and guardians about state standards and testing requirements, including the high school exit examination. (E) Creation, maintenance, and support of parent centers located on schoolsites to educate parents and guardians regarding pupil expectations and provide support to parents and guardians in their efforts to help their children learn. (F) Programs targeted at parents and guardians of special education pupils. (G) Efforts to develop a culture at the schoolsite focused on college attendance, including programs to educate parents and guardians regarding college entrance requirements and options. (H) Providing more bilingual personnel at the schoolsite and at school related functions to communicate more effectively with parents and guardians who speak a language other than English. (I) Providing an opportunity for parents to monitor online, if the technology is available, and in compliance with applicable state and federal privacy laws, the academic progress and attendance of their children. (f) (1) The facilities, curriculum, instructional materials, and support services component shall contain a strategy to provide an environment that is conducive to teaching and learning and that includes the development of a high-quality curriculum and instruction aligned with the academic content and performance standards adopted pursuant to Section 60605 and the standards for English language development adopted pursuant to Section 60811 to measure progress made towards achieving English language proficiency. At a minimum, this strategy shall include the goal of providing adequate logistical support including, but not limited to, curriculum, quality instruction, instructional materials, support services, and supplies for every pupil. (2) To achieve the goal specified in paragraph (1), a school in its action plan may include, among others, any of the following options: (A) State and locally developed valid and reliable assessments based on state academic content standards. (B) Increased learning time in key curricular areas identified as needing attention, including mathematics. (C) The addition of more pupil support services staff, including, but not limited to, paraprofessionals, counselors, library media teachers, nurses, psychologists, social workers, speech therapists, audiologists, and speech pathologists. (D) Pupil support centers for additional tutoring or homework assistance. (E) Use of most current standards-aligned textbooks adopted by the State Board of Education, including materials for English language learners. (F) For secondary schools, offering advanced placement courses and courses that meet the requirements for admission to the University of California or the California State University. (g) A school action plan to improve pupil performance that is developed for participation in the program established pursuant to this article shall meet the requirements of subdivisions (d) and (e) of Section 52054 and this article. 52055.630. (a) Before a school action plan is submitted to the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the plan shall be presented at a regularly scheduled public meeting of the governing board of the school district. (b) In addition to involving the teachers in the development of the action plan, the school district shall certify that it has met and consulted with the exclusive representative of certificated employees on the action plan. The governing board of the school district shall approve the plan and certify that the plan contains all of the essential components required pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 52055.625. (c) This program and an action plan for any schools participating in the program shall not be deemed to supersede conflicting language in the collective bargaining contracts of that school's district. All matters within the scope of collective bargaining continue to be subject to it. 52055.640. (a) As a condition of the receipt of funds for the initial and each subsequent year of funding pursuant to this article and to ensure that the school is progressing towards meeting the goals of each of the essential components of its school action plan, each year the school district shall submit a report to the Superintendent that includes the following: (1) The academic improvement of pupils within the participating school as measured by the tests under Section 60640 and the progress made towards achieving English language proficiency as measured by the English language development test administered pursuant to Section 60810. (2) The improvement of distribution of experienced teachers holding a valid California teaching credential across the district. Commencing with the 2004-05 fiscal year, for a school district with a school initially applying to participate in the program on or after July 1, 2004, the report shall include whether at least 80 percent of the teachers assigned to the school are credentialed and the number of classes in which 20 percent or more pupils are English learners and assigned to teachers who do not possess a certificate issued pursuant to Section 44253.3, 44253.4, or 44253.7 or have not completed training pursuant to Section 44253.10, or are not otherwise authorized by statute to be assigned to those classes. This paragraph does not relieve a school district from complying with state or federal law regarding teachers of English learners. (3) The availability of instructional materials in core content areas that are aligned with the academic content and performance standards, including textbooks, for each pupil, including English language learners. For a school district that initially applies to participate in the High Priority Schools Grant Program during the 2004-05 fiscal year, or any fiscal year thereafter, the definition of "sufficient textbooks or instructional materials" contained in subdivision (c) of Section 60119 applies to this paragraph. (4) The number of parents and guardians presently involved at each participating schoolsite as compared to the number participating at the beginning of the program. (5) The number of pupils attending after school, tutoring, or homework assistance programs. (6) For participating secondary schools, the number of pupils who are enrolled in and successfully completing advanced placement courses, by type, and requirements for admission to the University of California or the California State University, including courses in algebra, biology, and United States or world history. (b) The report on the pupil literacy and achievement component shall be disaggregated by numerically significant subgroups, as defined in Section 52052, and English language learners and have a focus on improved scores in reading and mathematics as measured by the following: (1) The Academic Performance Index, including the data collected pursuant to tests that are part of the Standardized Testing and Reporting Program and the writing sample that is part of that program. (2) The results of the primary language test pursuant to Section 60640. (3) Graduation rates, when the methodology for collecting this data has been confirmed to be valid and reliable. (4) In addition, a school may use locally developed assessments to assist it in determining the pupil progress in academic literacy and achievement. (c) The report on the quality of staff component shall include, but not be limited to, the following information: (1) The number of teachers at the schoolsite holding a valid California teaching credential or district or university intern certificate or credential compared to those teachers at the same schoolsite holding a preintern certificate, emergency permit, or waiver. (2) The number and ratio of teachers across the district holding a valid California teaching credential or district or university intern certificate or credential compared to those holding a preintern certificate, emergency permit, or waiver. (3) The number of principals having completed training pursuant to Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 44510) of Chapter 3 of Part 25. (4) The number of principals by credential type or years of experience and length of time at the schoolsite by years. (d) The report on the parental involvement component shall include explicit involvement strategies being implemented at the schoolsite that are directly linked to activities supporting pupil academic achievement and verification that the schoolsite has developed a school-parent compact as required by Section 51101. (e) All comparisons made in the reports required pursuant to this section shall be based on baseline data provided by the district and schoolsite in the action plan that is certified and submitted with the initial application. (f) To the extent that data is already reported to the Superintendent, a school district need not include the data in the reports submitted pursuant to this section. (g) Before submitting the reports required pursuant to this section, the school district shall, at a regularly scheduled public meeting of the governing board, review a participating school's progress towards achieving those goals. 52055.645. (a) For the purpose of evaluating academic growth in core curriculum areas and determining the efficacy of the school action plan, schools are strongly encouraged to assess the academic progress of pupils on an annual basis and to evaluate the results in order to determine whether changes to the schoolsite plan are needed. (b) In conducting these annual assessments, a school shall use the English language development test, administered pursuant to Section 60810 to measure progress towards achieving English language proficiency, where appropriate and the tests that are part of the Standardized Testing and Reporting Program. In addition, a school may use any curriculum-based achievement test to assess pupil growth if the test is proven to be valid and reliable. (c) The results of these annual assessments shall be reported annually to the school district. The State Board of Education may use these results as quantifiable measurements of significant growth when determining whether to grant a waiver for an additional year of funding. 52055.647. As a condition of funding, a school shall certify that the eligible teachers and administrators assigned to a participating school will participate in the programs established pursuant to Assembly Bill 466 of the 2001-02 Regular Session and Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 44510) of Chapter 3 of Part 25. 52055.650. (a) Section 52055.5 does not apply to a school participating in the High Priority Schools Grant Program. (b) Twenty-four months after receipt of funding for implementation of the action plan pursuant to Sections 52054.5 and 52055.600, a school that has not met its growth targets each year shall be subject to review by the State Board of Education. This review shall include an examination of the school's progress relative to the components and reports made pursuant to Section 52055.640. The Superintendent, with the approval of the State Board of Education, may direct that the governing board of a school take appropriate action and adopt appropriate strategies to provide corrective assistance to the school in order to achieve the components and benchmarks established in the school's action plan. (c) Thirty-six months after receipt of funding to implement a school action plan, a school that has met or exceeded its growth target each year shall receive a monetary or nonmonetary award, under the Governor's Performance Award Program, as set forth in Section 52057. Funds received pursuant to that section may be used at the school's discretion. (d) Thirty-six months after receipt of funding to implement a school action plan, a school that has not met its growth targets each year, but demonstrates significant growth, as determined by the State Board of Education, shall continue to participate in the program and receive funding as specified in Sections 52054.5 and 52055.600. (e) Notwithstanding any other law, the Superintendent, with the approval of the State Board of Education, shall follow the course of action prescribed by paragraph (1) or (2) with respect to a school that does not meet its growth targets within the periods described in either subdivision (c) or (d), as applicable, and has failed to show significant growth, as determined by the State Board of Education. (1) Require the district to enter into a contract with a school assistance and intervention team. (A) Team members should possess a high degree of knowledge and skills in the areas of school leadership, curriculum, and instruction aligned to state academic content and performance standards, classroom management and discipline, academic assessment, parent-school relations, and evaluation and research-based reform strategies and have proven successful expertise specific to the challenges inherent in high-priority schools. (B) The team shall provide intensive support and expertise to implement the school reform initiatives in the plan. Decisions about interventions shall be data driven. A school assistance and intervention team shall work with school staff, site planning teams, administrators, and district staff to improve pupil literacy and achievement by assessing the degree of implementation of the current action plan, refining and revising the action plan, and making recommendations to maximize the use of fiscal resources and personnel in achieving the goals of the plan. The district shall provide support and assistance to enhance the work of the team at the targeted schoolsites. (C) Not later than 60 days after the school's API becomes public, the team shall complete an initial report. The report shall include recommendations for corrective actions chosen from a range of interventions, including the reallocation of district fiscal resources to ensure that appropriate resources are targeted to those specific interventions identified in the recommendations of the team for the targeted schools and other changes deemed appropriate to make progress toward meeting the school's growth target. Not later than 90 days after the API is made public, the governing board of the school district shall adopt the team's recommendations at a regularly scheduled meeting of the governing board. The governing board may not place the adoption on the consent calendar. The report shall be submitted to the Superintendent and the State Board of Education. (D) No less than three times during the year, the school district and schoolsite shall present the team with data regarding progress toward the goals established by the team's initial assessment. The data shall be presented to the governing board of the school district at a regularly scheduled meeting. The team shall, to the extent possible, utilize existing site data. The data shall also be provided to the Superintendent and the State Board of Education. Every effort shall be made to report this data in a manner that minimizes the length and complexity of the reporting requirement in order to maximize the focus on improving pupil literacy and achievement. (E) An action taken pursuant to this paragraph shall not increase local costs or require reimbursement by the Commission on State Mandates. (2) The Superintendent shall assume all the legal rights, duties, and powers of the governing board with respect to the school. The Superintendent, in consultation with the State Board of Education and the governing board of the school district, shall reassign the principal of that school subject to the findings in subdivision (i). In addition to reassigning the principal, the Superintendent, in consultation with the State Board of Education, shall, notwithstanding any other provision of law, do at least one of the following: (A) Revise attendance options for pupils to allow them to attend any public school in which space is available. If an additional attendance option is made available, this option may not require either the sending or receiving school district to incur additional transportation costs. (B) Allow parents or guardians to apply directly to the State Board of Education for the establishment of a charter school and allow parents or guardians to establish the charter school at the existing schoolsite. (C) Under the supervision of the Superintendent, assign the management of the school to a college, university, county office of education, or other appropriate educational institution. However, the Superintendent may not assume the management of the school. (D) Reassign other certificated employees of the school. (E) Renegotiate a new collective bargaining agreement at the expiration of the existing collective bargaining agreement. (F) Reorganize the school. (G) Close the school. (f) In addition to the actions listed in subdivision (e), the Superintendent, in consultation with the State Board of Education, may take any other action considered necessary or desirable against the school district or the school district governing board, including appointment of a new superintendent or suspension of the authority of the governing board with respect to a school that does not meet its growth targets within the periods described in either subdivision (b) or (c), as applicable, and has failed to show significant growth, as determined by the State Board of Education. (g) Before the Superintendent may take any action against a principal pursuant to subdivision (e), the Superintendent or a designee of the Superintendent shall hold a public hearing on the matter in the school district and make both of the following findings: (1) A finding that the principal had the authority to take specific enumerated actions that would have helped the school meet its performance goals. (2) A finding that the principal failed to take specific enumerated actions pursuant to paragraph (1). (h) An action taken pursuant to subdivision (e), (f), or (g) shall not increase local costs or require reimbursement by the Commission on State Mandates. (i) An action taken pursuant to subdivision (e), (f), or (g) shall be accompanied by specific findings by the Superintendent and the State Board of Education that the action is directly related to the identified causes for continued failure by a school to meet its performance goals. (j) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a school participating in the High Priority Schools Grant Program that received a planning grant pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 52053 in the 1999-2000 fiscal year is eligible to receive funding pursuant to Section 52055.600 in the 2002-03 fiscal year only. (2) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a school participating in the High Priority Schools Grant Program that received a planning grant pursuant to subdivision (l) of Section 52053 in the 2000-01 fiscal year is eligible to receive funding pursuant to Section 52055.600 in the 2002-03 and 2003-04 fiscal years only. (3) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a school participating in the High Priority Schools Grant Program that received a planning grant pursuant to subdivision (l) of Section 52053 in the 2001-02 fiscal year is eligible to receive funding pursuant to Section 52055.600 in only the 2002-03, 2003-04, and 2004-05 fiscal years. (k) Notwithstanding the growth target timelines set forth in subdivisions (b), (c), (d), and (e), for a school that receives funds pursuant to Section 52055.600 during the 2002-03 or 2003-04 fiscal year, the growth target deadline for subdivision (b) is December 31, 2004, and the growth target deadline for subdivisions (c), (d), and (e) is December 31, 2005. (l) A school that receives funds pursuant to Section 52055.600 during the 2005-06 or 2006-07 fiscal year shall meet the growth target specified in subdivision (b) no later than December 31, 2007, and the growth target specified in subdivisions (c), (d), and (e) no later than December 31, 2008. 52055.655. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision (c) of Section 52055.650, a school participating in the High Priority Schools Grant Program that meets or exceeds its API growth target shall continue to receive funding under this program in the amount specified in Sections 52054.5 and 52055.600 for one additional year of implementation, less the amount received pursuant to Section 52057. (b) From funds made available to the department pursuant to Chapter 749 of the Statutes of 2001, the department shall conduct a study on the issue of sustainability of funding for high-priority schools. The issues to be addressed in this study shall include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) An objective rather than a comparative view of the necessity of sustaining supplemental funding over time to address the ongoing needs of high-priority pupils, and the impact of policies that only provide funding over a specified period of time. (2) A description of the ongoing needs of high-priority schools, as identified in needs assessments submitted pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 52055.620 and the sources of funding schools used to meet these needs. (3) An analysis of the use of funds provided pursuant to this article and the effectiveness of that use in meeting the continued or changing needs of communities served by high-priority schools. This analysis shall include an evaluation of the growth in academic achievement realized by participating schools and the ability of those schools to sustain growth in academic achievement if funding is continued. (4) An assessment of whether local, state, and federal resources are likely to be sufficient to sustain all or some of the academic improvements made in high-priority schools after this state subsidy expires, taking into account prospects for the subsequent pupil population's incidence of poverty and low socioeconomic status. 52055.656. (a) Each school district with schools participating in the High Priority Schools Grant Program established pursuant to Section 52055.600 shall submit to the Superintendent of Public Instruction an evaluation of the impact, costs, and benefits of the program as it relates to the school district and the schools under its jurisdiction that are participating in the program and whether or not the schools met their growth targets, with an analysis of the reasons why the schools have or have not met those growth targets. Costs to develop and submit the evaluation shall be funded with resources provided pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 52053). The evaluation shall be submitted by November 30, subsequent to the first full year of action plan implementation by participating schools, and on November 30, of each year thereafter. (b) By January 15, 2003, the Superintendent of Public Instruction shall develop, and the State Board of Education shall approve, the guidelines for a request for proposal for an independent evaluator as described in this subdivision. By June 30, 2003, the Superintendent of Public Instruction shall contract with an independent evaluator to prepare a multiyear comprehensive evaluation of the implementation, impact, costs, and benefits of the High Priority Schools Grant Program. The preliminary results of the multiyear evaluation shall be disseminated to the Legislature, the Governor and interested parties no later than June 30, 2004. An interim report shall be disseminated to the Legislature, the Governor, and interested parties no later than June 30, 2005. The final comprehensive evaluation shall be disseminated to the Legislature, the Governor, and interested parties no later than June 30, 2006. The final report shall include recommendations for necessary or desirable modifications to the programs established pursuant to this chapter. (c) The evaluations shall consider all of the following: (1) Pupil performance data, including, but not limited to, results of assessments used to determine whether or not schools have made significant progress towards meeting their growth targets. (2) Program implementation data, including, but not limited to, a review of startup activities, community support, parental participation, staff development activities associated with implementation of the program, percentage of fully credentialed teachers, percentage of teachers who hold emergency credentials, percentage of teachers assigned outside their subject area of competence, the accreditation status of the school if appropriate, average size per grade level, and the number of pupils in a multitrack year-round educational program. (3) (A) Pupil performance data, and its impact on the API, for each of the following subgroups: (i) English language learners. (ii) Pupils with exceptional needs. (iii) Pupils that qualify for free or reduced price meals and are enrolled in schools that receive funds under Chapter 1 of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended by the Augustus F. Hawkins-Robert T. Stafford Elementary and Secondary School Improvement Amendments of 1988 (P.L. 100-290). (B) Information concerning individual pupils may not be disclosed in the process of preparing pupil performance data pursuant to this subdivision. 52055.660. Notwithstanding any provision of this article, for the 2001-02 fiscal year, the Superintendent of Public Instruction shall allocate funds for the program established by this article as specified in the Budget Act of 2001, as amended by legislation enacted during the 2001-02 Third Extraordinary Session. 52055.662. It is the intent of the Legislature to appropriate any savings achieved as a result of schools being phased out of the Immediate Intervention Underperforming School Program and the High Priority Schools Grant Program to provide High Priority Schools Grant awards to eligible schools, pursuant to Section 52055.605, that have not previously received a grant under this program.
Disclaimer: These codes may not be the most recent version. California may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.