Matthew Anthony Nartker v. The State of Wyoming
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2022 WY 34 October Term, A.D. 2021 March 9, 2022 MATTHEW ANTHONY NARTKER, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-21-0237 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). ORDER AFFIRMING ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION [¶ 1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that Appellant has not filed a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s September 3, 2021, Order Denying Defendant’s Motion for Sentence Reduction. [¶ 2] On January 6, 2022, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently entered an Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief. This Court ordered that, on or before February 21, 2022, Appellant was permitted to file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the issues he would like the Court to consider in this appeal. This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision on this appeal. Appellant did not file a pro se brief or other pleading in the time allotted. [¶ 3] Now, following a careful review of the record and the Anders brief submitted by appellate counsel, this Court finds appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be granted and the district court’s Order Denying Defendant’s Motion for Sentence Reduction should be affirmed. It is, therefore, [¶ 4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel for Appellant Matthew Anthony Nartker, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Appellant; and it is further [¶ 5] ORDERED that the Converse County District Court’s September 3, 2021, Order Denying Defendant’s Motion for Sentence Reduction be, and the same hereby is, affirmed. [¶ 6] DATED this 9th day of March, 2022. BY THE COURT: /s/ KATE M. FOX Chief Justice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
