Kaleb Paul Kirsop v. The State of Wyoming
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2021 WY 69 April Term, A.D. 2021 May 19, 2021 KALEB PAUL KIRSOP, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-21-0021 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE [¶ 1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that Appellant has not filed a pro se brief in the time allotted. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant entered unconditional guilty pleas to one count of second-degree sexual assault, one count of strangulation of a household member, and one count of felony stalking. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-303(a)(ii); § 6-2-509(a)(i); and § 6-2-506(b). The district court imposed three concurrent sentences of eight to ten years. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s October 7, 2020, “Judgment and Sentence.” [¶ 2] On March 15, 2021, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a “Motion to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently ordered that Appellant may “file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the issues he would like the Court to consider in this appeal.” This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would “make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision” on this appeal. Appellant’s pro se brief was due for filing on or before April 29, 2021. Appellant did not file a pro se brief or other pleading in the time allotted. [¶ 3] Now, following a careful review of the record and the “Anders brief” submitted by appellate counsel, this Court finds that appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be granted and the district court’s judgment and sentence should be affirmed. It is, therefore, [¶ 4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel for Appellant Kaleb Paul Kirsop, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Appellant; and it is further [¶ 5] ORDERED that the Sweetwater County District Court’s October 7, 2020, “Judgment and Sentence” be, and the same hereby is, affirmed. [¶ 6] DATED this 19th day of May, 2021. BY THE COURT: /s/ MICHAEL K. DAVIS Chief Justice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
