State v. Ondra Bond

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
2001 WI 56 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-3139-CR Complete Title of Case: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Ondra Bond, Defendant-Appellant. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS 2000 WI App 118 Reported at: 237 Wis. 2d 633, 614 N.W.2d 552 (Published) Opinion Filed: Submitted on Briefs: Oral Argument: May 2, 2001 Source of APPEAL COURT: COUNTY: JUDGE: Circuit Milwaukee Jeffrey A. Wagner JUSTICES: Concurred: Dissented: Not Participating: SYKES, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: For the petitioner-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle, attorney general. For the defendant-appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Ellen Henak, assistant state public defender. 2001 WI 56 NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. No. 98-3139-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT State of Wisconsin, FILED Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, MAY 31, 2001 v. Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Supreme Court Madison, WI Ondra Bond, Defendant-Appellant. REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. ¶1 to affirm PER CURIAM. or reverse Affirmed. The court is equally divided on whether the decision of the court of appeals. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, and Justice David T. Prosser would affirm; Justice William A. Bablitch, Justice Jon P. Wilcox, and Justice N. Patrick Crooks would reverse. ¶2 affirmed. Justice Diane S. Sykes did not participate. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is No. 1 98-3139-CR

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.