State v. Daniel G. Scheidell
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-1426-CR Complete Title of Case: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Daniel G. Scheidell Defendant-Appellant. ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Previously reported at: 227 Wis. 2d 285, 595 N.W.2d 661, (1999) Opinion Filed: Submitted on Briefs: Oral Argument: October 22, 1999 Source of APPEAL COURT: COUNTY: JUDGE: JUSTICES: Concurred: Dissented: Not Participating: ATTORNEYS: SYKES, J., did not participate No. 97-1426-CR NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. No. 97-1426-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT State of Wisconsin, FILED Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, OCT 22, 1999 v. Marilyn L. Graves Clerk of Supreme Court Madison, WI Daniel G. Scheidell Defendant-Appellant. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Defendant-Appellant (on motion Daniel G. for reconsideration). Scheidell moves for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Scheidell, 227 Wis. 2d 285, declined 595 to N.W.2d review 661 an (1999), issue on grounds concerning the that this circuit court court s refusal to admit comparative handprint evidence offered by the defendant. ¶2 In the exercise of judicial discretion, we have carefully considered the circuit court s ruling on the handprint evidence. We agree with the court of appeals that the circuit court correctly exercised its discretion in refusing to admit Scheidell s exhibit. State v. Scheidell, 220 Wis. 2d 753, 774, 584 N.W.2d 897 (Ct. App. 1998). ¶3 The motion for reconsideration costs. 1 is denied without No. 97-1426-CR ¶4 DIANE S. SYKES, J., did not participate. 2 No. 97-1426-CR 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
