Andrea Moulas v. PBC Productions Incorporated
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-1784 Complete Title of Case: Andrea Moulas, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. PBC Productions Incorporated, d/b/a/ Milwaukee Admirals, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, Bradley Center Corporation and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents, Compcare Health Insurance Corporation, Defendant. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS Reported at: 213 Wis. 2d 406, 570 N.W.2d 739 (Ct. App. 1997-PUBLISHED) Opinion Filed: Submitted on Briefs: Oral Argument: Source of APPEAL COURT: COUNTY: JUDGE: April 30, 1998 April 7, 1998 Circuit Milwaukee Jacqueline D. Schellinger JUSTICES: Concurred: Dissented: Not Participating: ATTORNEYS: For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by William A. Denny, Jonathan Cermele and Denny & Yanisch, Elm Grove and oral argument by William A. Denny and Jonathan Cermele. For the defendants-respondents there was a brief by Michael D. Stotler and Bren, Przybeck & Stotler, Milwaukee and oral argument by Michael D. Stotler. No. 96-1784 NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. No. 96-1784 STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT FILED Andrea Moulas, APR 30, 1998 Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Marilyn L. Graves Clerk of Supreme Court Madison, WI PBC Productions Incorporated, d/b/a/ Milwaukee Admirals, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, Bradley Center Corporation and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents, Compcare Health Insurance Corporation, Defendant. REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. ΒΆ1 PER CURIAM. The court is equally Affirmed. divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals, Moulas v. PBC Productions Inc., 213 Wis. 2d 406, 570 N.W.2d 739 (Ct. App. 1997), should be affirmed or reversed. Justice DONALD W. STEINMETZ, Justice JON P. WILCOX and Justice N. PATRICK CROOKS would affirm; Chief Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH and Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY would reverse. Justice JANINE P. GESKE did not participate. decision of the court of appeals is affirmed. 1 Accordingly, the 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
