Errata: Janell R. S. v. J.R. S.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 96-3308 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: JANELL S., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. J.R.S., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. ERRATA SHEET Marilyn L. Graves Clerk of Court of Appeals P.O. Box 1688 Madison, WI 53701-1688 Peg Carlson Chief Staff Attorney 119 Martin Luther King Blvd. Madison, WI 53703 Court of Appeals District I 633 W. Wisconsin Ave., #1400 Milwaukee, WI 53203-1918 Court of Appeals District II 2727 N. Grandview Blvd. Waukesha, WI 53188-1672 Court of Appeals District III 740 Third Street Wausau, WI 54403-5784 Court of Appeals District IV 119 Martin Luther King Blvd. Madison, WI 53703 Jennifer Krapf Administrative Assistant 119 Martin Luther King Blvd. Madison, WI 53703 Hon. Robert W. Radcliffe Jackson County Courthouse 307 Main Street Black River Falls, WI 54615-1776 NO. 96-3308 Claudia J. Singleton T.C.# 90 FA 1 Jackson County Courthouse 307 Main Street Black River Falls, WI 54615-1776 Kathleen C. Mann 115 Fifth Ave. S., #304 La Crosse, WI 54602-2623 Gerald R. Fox P.O. Box 512 Black River Falls, WI 54615 Timothy Osicka 308 Grand Avenue Wausau, WI 54403 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the attached page 10 is to be substituted for page 10 in the above-captioned opinion which was released on October 2, 1997. Dated this 3rd day of October, 1997. 2 NO. 96-3308 outcome on retrial would be different. See Vollmer v. Luety, 156 Wis.2d 1, 19, 456 N.W.2d 797, 805 (1990). Janell asks that we order a retrial before a different judge. We decline to do so. There is no reason to believe that she cannot receive a fair hearing and enough time to adequately present the testimony she believes will prove her position. A trial judge s unhappiness with counsel s method of presenting a case is not a reason to assume bias. Judges are people too, and cannot be expected to be pleased with all attorneys. But this case is not about counsel; it is about Jake. No costs to either party. By the Court. Order reversed and cause remanded with directions. Not recommended for publication in the official reports. 10 NO. 96-3308 10

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.