Errata: Northridge Company v. W.R. Grace & Company

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Nos. 95-1193 95-2035 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I No. 95-1193 NORTHRIDGE COMPANY, a partnership, SOUTHRIDGE COMPANY, a partnership, SIDNEY KOHL, as Trustee under the Sidney Kohl 1985 Trust, ALLEN KOHL, 1984 Trust, HERBERT KOHL, DOLORES KOHL SOLOVY, THE DOLORES KOHL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION, INC., THE TAUBMAN REALTY GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Massachusetts Limited Partnership, ELLIOT M. SIEGEL, as Trustee under the Elliot M. Siegel 1985 Trust, MELODEE SIEGEL KORNACKER, as Trustee under the Melodee Siegel Kornacker Trust, ANGELA W. SIEGEL, as Trustee under Trust A, ANGELA W. SIEGEL, as Trustee under Trust B, SIDNEY KOHL, as Trustee under the Sidney A. Kohl 1985 Trust, DOLORES KOHL SOLOVY and RALPH LOEWENBERG, as Trustees under the Allen Kohl 1974 Trust, F/B/O Daniel Kohl, F/B/O Elizabeth Kohl, F/B/O David Kohl, F/B/O Michael Kohl, JEROLD SOLOVY, as Trustee under the Lawrence Kohl Family Trust, JEROLD SOLOVY, as Trustee under the Robert Kohl Family Trust, and ELLIOT M. SIEGEL, as Trustee under the Elliot M. Siegel 1985 Trust, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Cross Appellants, v. ERRATA SHEET Nos. 95-1193 95-2035 W. R. GRACE & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant-Cross Respondent. ______________________________________________________________________________ No. 95-2035 NORTHRIDGE COMPANY, a partnership, SOUTHRIDGE COMPANY, a partnership, SIDNEY KOHL, as Trustee under the Sidney Kohl 1985 Trust, ALLEN KOHL, 1984 Trust, HERBERT KOHL, DOLORES KOHL SOLOVY, THE DOLORES KOHL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION, INC., THE TAUBMAN REALTY GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Massachusetts Limited Partnership, ELLIOT M. SIEGEL, as Trustee under the Elliot M. Siegel 1985 Trust, MELODEE SIEGEL KORNACKER, as Trustee under the Melodee Siegel Kornacker Trust, ANGELA W. SIEGEL, as Trustee under Trust A, ANGELA W. SIEGEL, as Trustee under Trust B, SIDNEY KOHL, as Trustee under the Sidney A. Kohl 1985 Trust, DOLORES KOHL SOLOVY and RALPH LOEWENBERG, as Trustees under the Allen Kohl 1974 Trust, F/B/O Daniel Kohl, F/B/O Elizabeth Kohl, F/B/O David Kohl, F/B/O Michael Kohl, JEROLD SOLOVY, as Trustee under the Lawrence Kohl Family Trust, JEROLD SOLOVY, as Trustee under the Robert Kohl Family Trust, and ELLIOT M. SIEGEL, as Trustee under the Elliot M. Siegel 1985 Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. -2- Nos. 95-1193 95-2035 W. R. GRACE & COMPANY, Marilyn L. Graves Clerk of Court of Appeals 231 East, State Capitol Madison, WI 53702 Peg Carlson Chief Staff Attorney 119 Martin Luther King Blvd. Madison, WI 53703 Jennifer Krapf Administrative Assistant 119 Martin Luther King Blvd. Madison, WI 53703 Court of Appeals, District II 2727 N. Grandview Blvd. Suite 300 Waukesha, WI 53188-1672 Court of Appeals, District III 740 Third Street Wausau, WI 54401-6292 Court of Appeals, District IV 119 Martin Luther King Blvd. Madison, WI 53703 Hon. Laurence C. Gram, Jr. (L.C. #89-CV-1991) Milwaukee Cty. Safety Bldg. 820 W. State St., Rm. 578 Milwaukee, WI 53233 Gary Barczak Appeals Division 901 N. Ninth St., Rm. G-8 Milwaukee, WI 53233 John A. Busch Michael, Best & Friedrich 100 E. Wisconsin Ave. Milwaukee, WI 53202-4286 Thomas R. Cannon O'Neil, Cannon & Hollman 111 E. Wisconsin Ave. Suite #1400 Milwaukee, WI 53202-4803 Dean P. Laing O'Neil, Cannon & Hollman 111 E. Wisconsin Ave. Suite #1400 Milwaukee, WI 53202-4803 Paul F. Linn Michael, Best & Friedrich 100 E. Wisconsin Ave. Milwaukee, WI 53202-4286 Gregory W. Lyons O'Neil, Cannon & Hollman 111 E. Wisconsin Ave. Suite #1400 Milwaukee, WI 53202-4803 Scott J. Campbell Michael, Best & Friedrich 100 E. Wisconsin Ave. Milwaukee, WI 53202-4286 Robert Hill -3- Nos. 95-1193 95-2035 Speights & Runyan 304 Lee Avenue P.O. Box 685 Hampton, SC 29924 C. Alan Runyan Speights & Runyan 304 Lee Avenue P.O. Box 685 Hampton, SC 29924 Amanda G. Steinmeyer Speights & Runyan 304 Lee Avenue P.O. Box 685 Hampton, SC 29924 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the attached page 24 is to be substituted for page 24 in the above-captioned opinion which was released on September 12, 1996. Dated this 5th day of December, 2006. -4- Nos. 95-1193 95-2035 costs. Therefore, Northridge's offer of $4,900,000 exceeded the judgment of $4,830,000 and, accordingly, we affirm the denial of double costs.1 Therefore, on the cross-appeal, we affirm on all issues except that involving the twenty percent where we reverse and remand for entry of judgment for Northridge in the amount of $4.83 million, plus costs and interest as allowed under ยง 814.04, STATS. By the Court. Judgment affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions; order affirmed. Recommended for publication in the official reports. 1 Because we affirm on this basis, we need not address Grace's argument that Northridge is not entitled to double costs because it presented a single offer on behalf of multiple plaintiffs. See Gross v. Hoffman, 227 Wis. 296, 300, 277 N.W. 663, 665 (1938) (only dispositive issue need be addressed). -24-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.