State Of Washington, Respondent V. Walid Amir Al-adssani, Appellant

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Respondent, v. WALID AMIR AL-ADSSANI, Appellant. PER CURIAM. No. 65665-1-I DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED: October 3, 2011 Walid Amir Al-Adssani appeals his conviction for bail jumping, arguing that the striking of a juror violated his right to due process, the information was defective, and the conviction was not supported by sufficient evidence. The State concedes that the information was fatally defective because it failed to give notice of an essential element, i.e. knowledge. State v. McCarty, 140 Wn.2d 420, 424-25, 998 P.2d 296 (2000)(information must set forth all essential elements). Although the State does not concede that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction, it will not refile charges because prosecution would serve no public purpose. Motion to Concede Error at 3. Respondent s Supp. Accordingly, the State concedes that the conviction should be reversed and dismissed with prejudice. We accept the concession. Reversed and remanded with directions to dismiss the conviction with prejudice. For the Court: -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.