State Of Washington, Respondent V. Mario Petrilli, Appellant
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. MARIO PETRILLI, Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 65538-8-I DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) FILED: November 26, 2012 Grosse, J. The Washington Supreme Court granted the State s petition for review of our first opinion in this matter and remanded the case to us for reconsideration in light of its decision in State v. Nunez.1 In our first opinion we followed State v. Bashaw2 and vacated a firearms sentence enhancement because the trial court instructed the Mario Petrilli jury it must be unanimous to answer whether the State proved the facts necessary to support the sentence enhancement. In Nunez, the Supreme Court overruled Bashaw and approved the instruction given by the trial court. Therefore, we now affirm Petrilli s judgment and sentence. WE CONCUR: 1 2 174 Wn.2d 707, 285 P.3d 21 (2012). 169 Wn.2d 133, 234 P.3d 195 (2010).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
