Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, * Lacy, Hassell, Keenan, and Koontz, JJ. DONNA FOSTER-ZAHID PER CURIAM September 12, 1997 v. Record No. 962512 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA In this case, we awarded appellant an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeals holding that the trial court did not err in ruling (1) that the trial court had jurisdiction to try appellant for violation of Code § 18.2-49.1(A), and (2) that Fairfax County was the proper venue in which to prosecute the appellant for that violation. Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth, 23 Va. App. 430, 477 S.E.2d 759 (1996). We have considered these questions, and for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm the judgment below. Affirmed. * Justice Stephenson participated in the hearing and decision of this case prior to the effective date of his retirement on July 1, 1997.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.