Daniel Martinez v. Zamudio Tree & Landscaping and the Uninsured Employer's Fund
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Humphreys, McCullough and Senior Judge Bumgardner DANIEL MARTINEZ v. Record No. 1927-13-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION* PER CURIAM JANUARY 28, 2014 ZAMUDIO TREE & LANDSCAPING AND THE UNINSURED EMPLOYER S FUND FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Gregory J. Park; Park & Park, P.C., on brief), for appellant. (Dana L. Plunkett; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C., on brief), for appellee The Uninsured Employer s Fund. No brief for appellee Zamudio Tree & Landscaping. Daniel Martinez appeals a decision of the Workers Compensation Commission denying his claim for temporary total disability benefits. On appeal, he claims the commission erred in concluding that the evidence was insufficient to establish an average weekly wage upon which temporary total disability benefits could be awarded. We have reviewed the record and the commission s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Martinez v. Zamudio Tree & Landscaping, JCN VA02000006921 (Sept. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
