State v. Stott
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS ----ooOoo---State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Brice Leonard Stott, Defendant and Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM DECISION (Not For Official Publication) Case No. 20090402-CA F I L E D (February 19, 2010) 2010 UT App 43 ----Second District, Ogden Department, 071901563 The Honorable Scott M. Hadley Attorneys: Randall W. Richards, Ogden, for Appellant Mark L. Shurtleff and Laura B. Dupaix, Salt Lake City, for Appellee ----- Before Judges Davis, McHugh, and Bench.1 PER CURIAM: Appellant Brice Leonard Stott appeals from his conviction and sentence for sexual abuse of a child. Stott's counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 783 (1967), and State v. Clayton, 639 P.2d 168 (Utah 1981). The brief "objectively demonstrate[s] that the issues raised are frivolous." State v. Flores, 855 P.2d 258, 260 (Utah Ct. App. 1993) (per curiam); see also Dunn v. Cook, 791 P.2d 873, 877 (Utah 1990) (stating that an Anders brief must demonstrate any "potentially meritorious" issues are actually frivolous). Based upon our independent examination of the record, we determine that the appeal is, indeed, wholly frivolous and, accordingly, we 1 The Honorable Russell W. Bench, Senior Judge, sat by special assignment pursuant to Utah Code section 78A-3-102 (2008) and rule 11-201(6) of the Utah Rules of Judicial Administration. affirm the decision of the district court and grant counsel's motion to withdraw. ______________________________ James Z. Davis, Presiding Judge ______________________________ Carolyn B. McHugh, Associate Presiding Judge ______________________________ Russell W. Bench, Senior Judge 20090402-CA 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
