State of Utah, in the interest of S.G., A.G., and S.G.

Annotate this Case
State of Utah, in the interest of S.G., A.G., and S.G. IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

----ooOoo----

State of Utah, in the interest of S.G., A.G., and S.G.,
children under eighteen years of age.
______________________________

State of Utah,
Appellee,

v.

C.G.,
Appellant.

MEMORANDUM DECISION
(Not For Official Publication)

Case No. 20010636-CA

F I L E D
March 28, 2002 2002 UT App 91 -----

Third District Juvenile, Salt Lake Department
The Honorable Robert S. Yeates

Attorneys:
John E. Laherty, Salt Lake City, for Appellant
Mark L. Shurtleff and John Peterson, Salt Lake City, for Appellee
Martha Pierce, Salt Lake City, Guardian Ad Litem -----

Before Judges Jackson, Davis, and Greenwood.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant C.G. appeals the order terminating her parental rights. Appellant's appointed counsel filed an Anders-type brief pursuant to In re D.C., 963 P.2d 761 (Utah Ct. App. 1998). The brief satisfies the requirements of this court's opinion in that case. Counsel further certified that he provided C.G. a copy of the proposed Anders-type brief and has incorporated into the brief all issues raised by Appellant. See id. at 765. Based upon our examination of the record of all proceedings in the juvenile court, we determine the appeal is wholly frivolous.

Accordingly, we affirm the juvenile court's order terminating C.G.'s parental rights and grant counsel's motion to withdraw.
 
 

______________________________
Norman H. Jackson,
Presiding Judge
 
 

______________________________
James Z. Davis, Judge
 
 

______________________________
Pamela T. Greenwood, Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.