Larry Kalmowitz and Rebecca Kalmowitz v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Appeal from County Court at Law of Smith County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-19-00324-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS LARRY KALMOWITZ AND REBECCA KALMOWITZ, APPELLANTS § APPEAL FROM THE V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Larry and Rebecca Kalmowitz, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal from a judgment signed on October 2, 2019. On October 4, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellants that their notice of appeal failed to contain the information specifically required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 (service) and 25.1(e) (notice) and that the appeal would be referred to the Court for dismissal unless a proper notice of appeal is filed on or before November 4. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c), 9.5, 25.1(e). That deadline expired, and Appellants have not filed a compliant notice of appeal or otherwise responded to this Court’s October 4 notice. Because Appellants failed, after notice, to comply with Rules 9.5 and 25.1(e), the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Opinion delivered November 27, 2019. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT NOVEMBER 27, 2019 NO. 12-19-00324-CV LARRY KALMOWITZ AND REBECCA KALMOWITZ, Appellants V. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 70553-B) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
