Georgia Patrick Lewis, AKA Georgia P. Lewis, AKA Georgia Lewis, AKA Georgia Mae Lewis, AKA Georgia M. Lewis, Georgia Lewis, Individually DBA Draycatan Electric v. Elliott Electric Supply, Inc. Appeal from 145th District Court of Nacogdoches County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-18-00183-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS GEORGIA PATRICK LEWIS, AKA GEORGIA P. LEWIS, AKA GEORGIA LEWIS, AKA GEORGIA MAE LEWIS, AKA GEORGIA M. LEWIS, GEORGIA LEWIS, INDIVIDUALLY DBA DRAYCATAN ELECTRIC, APPELLANT § APPEAL FROM THE 145TH § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT § NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS V. ELLIOTT ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC., APPELLEE MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). On July 10, 2018, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the filing fee in this appeal is due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Appellant was informed that failure to remit the filing fee on or before July 20, 2018, would result in the Court’s taking appropriate action, including dismissal of the case without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The date for remitting the filing fee has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the Court’s request. Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Opinion delivered July 31, 2018. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT JULY 31, 2018 NO. 12-18-00183-CV GEORGIA PATRICK LEWIS, AKA GEORGIA P. LEWIS, AKA GEORGIA LEWIS, AKA GEORGIA MAE LEWIS, AKA GEORGIA M. LEWIS, GEORGIA LEWIS, INDIVIDUALLY DBA DRAYCATAN ELECTRIC, Appellant V. ELLIOTT ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC., Appellee Appeal from the 145th District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. C1733067) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
